Pineville City Court, Et Al. v. City Of Pineville, Et Al.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 10, 2022
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
PINEVILLE CITY COURT, ET
AL. VS.
CITY OF PINEVILLE, ET AL.
No. 2022-C-00336
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: City of Pineville, et al. - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Writ Of
Certiorari, Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Number(s) 270,281, Court
of Appeal, Third Circuit, Number(s) 21-415;
_ _ _ _ _ _
May 10, 2022
Writ application granted - see briefing notice and Order.
PDG
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
05/10/2022 "See News Release 021 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

pupremr @sud
STATE OF LOUISIANA
$etu (Drleans
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L WEIMER
JUSTICES
WILLIAM J CRAIN
SCOTT J CRICHTON
JAMES T GENOVESE
JAY B MCCALLUM
JEFFERSON D HUGHES III
PIPER O GRIFFIN
Frst District
Second oislrict
Thrrd 0islnct
Fourlh Drstficl
Fifth Oislacl
Seventh Oistrlct
Srxlh Orstricl VERONICA O XOCLANES
CLERK OF COURT
400 Royal Sl Surle 4200
NEW ORLEANS LA 70130-8I02
TELEPHONE (5s4) 310-2300
HOME PAGE htlp //www lasc org
Mav 10. 2022
2022-C-00336 PINEVILLE CITY COURT. ET AL. VS. CITY OF PINEVILI,E.
ET AL.
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set fbr oral argument on this Court's next
available docket. A copy of the official docket rvith the specilic date and time of oral argument will be
mailed out.
Please note Section 8 of Rule VII ofthe Rules ofthis Court provides that the aDD licant or relato r. as
the case mav be m ust file their bric fs on or before June 6,2022: and the resr)ondent on or beforc
June 21,2022.
Oral argument rvill be waived if brief is untimel) filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper should he
fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed s'ith the customarl "Blueback" or other llexible nraterial. In
criminal proceedings. the court direcls that counsel must file a brief. Failure to do so mav subject counsel to
a penalty of contempt of Court.
It is further provided in Rule VII. Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shallbe deemed timell filedil'
mailed on or belbre the due date. If the brief is received bl mail on the first legal dal follouing the
expiration olthe delal'. there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it uas timell filed. In all cases rrhere
the presumplion does not appl1. the timeliness of the mailing shall be shorm only bv an otficial United
States postmark or by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Sen ice. or bona flde
commercial mail sen'ices such as Federal Express or United Parcel Sen,ice. made at the timc ol mailing
which indicates the date thereof . Anv other date stamp. such as a private commercial mail meter stantp. or
label liom an Automated Postal Center. shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Briefs forq'arded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only ifreceived bl the
clerk on or before the last day ofthe delay for filing.
With kindest regards, I remain.
ly yours,
Chan
Deputl Clerk
RC: RC
ccs: All Counsel
Hon. David M. Williams
Hon. Robin L. Hooter
Hon. Renee R. Simien
9th Judicial District Court: 270,281
Court of Appeal, Third Circuit: 2l -415
NOTE: FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES WRIT GRANTED May 10.2022
MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
05/10/22

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
PINEVILLE CITY COURT. ET AL.
VERSUS
CITY OF PINEVILLE. ET AL,
On Writ of Certiorari andior Review
Ninth Judicial District Couft, Parish of Rapides. No. 270,281 I
Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. No.2l-415.
And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5. of the
Constitution of Louisiana. made and issued the following order, ro wit- "lt is
ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of
Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel fbr all parties
be notified."
Now. therefore. the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is herebl,
commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court. to
send up forthwith to this Court. in accordance with Supreme Court Rule I, at the
City of New Orleans. the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. on
this 10'h day of May, in the year of our Lord,
Two Thousand Twenty-Two.
Veronica O. Koclanes
Clerk of Court
Deputy Clerk of Court
No. 2022-C-00336