2022-C-00425 Precedential Writ application granted - see briefing notice and order. Processed

Nar Solutions, Inc. v. Bryan K. Kuhn

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed May 24, 2022

Also decided on this docket: La., December 9, 2022

Opinion text

Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 24, 2022
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
NAR SOLUTIONS, INC.
VS.
BRYAN K. KUHN
No. 2022-C-00425
_ _ _ _
_ _
IN R
E: NAR Solutions, Inc. - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying For Writ Of Certiorari,
Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Number(s) 803-0 40, Court of
Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number(s) 21-CA-256;
_ _ _ _ _ _
May 24, 2022
Writ application granted - See briefing notice and Order.
JBM
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
PDG
05/24/2022 "See News Release 024 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L WEIMER
JUSTICES
WILLIAM J CRAIN
SCOTT J CRICHTON
JAMES T GENOVESE
JAY B MCCALLUM
JEFFERSON D HUGHES Ill
PIPER D GRIFFIN
Sixth District
First District
Second District
Third District
Fourth D1stnct
F1tth District
Seventh District
>uprrmr filoud
STATE OF LOUISIANA
�e(u ®rleuns
May 24, 2022
VERONICA O KOCLANES
CLERK OF COURT
400 Royal St . Suite 4200
NEW ORLEANS. LA 70130-8102
TELEPHONE (504) 310-2300
HOME PAGE http //www lase org
2022-C-00425 AR SOLUTIONS. I C. VS. BRYA K. KUHN
OTE: FOR BRlEFrNG PURPOSES WRIT GRA TED May 24. 2022
MEMORA OUM TO CO SEL rN CAPTIO ED CASE:
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this Court's next
available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time or oral argument will be
mailed out.
Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court provides that the applicant or relator, as
the case mav be, must file their briefs on or before June 20, 2022; and the respondent on or before
July 8, 2022.
Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper should be
fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or other flexible material. In
criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to
a penalty of contempt of Court.
It is further provided in Rule VII. Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed timely filed ir
mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first legal day following the
expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it was timely filed. In all cases where
the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an official United
tales postmark or by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide
commercial mail services such as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing
which indicates the date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or
label from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Briefs fon\'arded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if recei,·ed by the
clerk on or before the last day of the delay for filing.
With kindest regards, I remain,
RC:RC
ccs: All Counsel
Hon. Raymond S. Steib, Jr.
Hon. Jon A. Gegenheimer
Hon. Curtis Pursell. Clerk
24th Judicial District Court: 803-040
Court of Appeal. Fifth Circuit: 2 I-CA-256
05/24/22

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 2022-C-00,125
NAR SOLUTIONS,INC.
VERSUS
BRYAN K. KUHN
On Writ of Certiorari
Twenty-Fourth Judicial District Court, Parish of Jefferson, No. 803-040;
Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 21-CA-256.
And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Anicle 5, Section 5, of the
Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "lt is
ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of
Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parries
be notified."
Now, therefore, the said District Coum and the Courr of Appeal is hereby
commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Coun, to
City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on
this I 8th day of May, in the year of our Lord,
Two Thousand Twenty-Two.
Veronica O. Koclanes
Clerk of Court
Deputy Clerk of Coun
send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the