Hidden Grove, Llc v. Richard A. Brauns And Leslie Brauns

Supreme Court of Louisiana
October 04, 2022
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
HIDDEN GROVE, LLC
VS.
RICHARD A. BRAUNS AND LESLIE BRAUNS
No. 2022-C-00757
_ _ _ _
_ _
IN R
E: Hidden Grove, LLC - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying For Writ Of Certiorari,
Parish of Lafayette, 15th Judicial District Court Number(s) 2013- 4910, Court of
Appeal, Third Circuit, Number(s) 21-548;
_ _ _ _ _ _
October 04, 2022
Writ application granted - see briefing notice and Order.
PDG
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
10/04/2022 "See News Release 043 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

Suytemt 6.sur1
STATE OF LOUISIANA
Setu (0rleans
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L, WEIMER
JUSTICES
WILLIAi/t J CRAIN
SCOTT J CRICHTON
JAMES T GENOVESE
JAY B. IICCALLUM
JEFFERSON D. HUGHES III
PIPER O GRIFFIN
Frrsl Dislncl
Second Drstrict
Third Distnct
Fourth Oistrict
Frlth Dislacl
Seventh Dist,icl
VERONICA O KOCLANES
CLERK OF COURT
400 Royal S1 . Surle 4200
NEW ORLEANS LA 70130.8102
TELEPHONE (504) 310-2300
HOME PAGE hnp //www Iasc org
October 04,2022
2022-C-00757 HIDDEN GROVE. LLC VS. RICHARD A. BRALINS AND
LESLIE BR{LINS
NOTE: FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES WRIT GRANTED October 04.2022
MEMORANDUM TO COLINSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this Court's next
available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time of oral argument will be
mailed out.
Srxth Drslncl
Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper should be
Iastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or other flexible material. In
criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to
a penalty of contempt of Court.
It is lurther provided in Rule VIl. Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed timely liled if
mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first legal day following the
expiration ofthe delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it was timely filed. ln all cases rvhere
the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an official United
States postmark or by olficial receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service. or bona fide
commercial mail services such as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing
rvhich indicates the date thereol. Any other date stamp. such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or
label from an Automated Postal Center. shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only ifreceived by the
clerk on or before the last day of the delay for filing.
With kindest regards, I remain,
truly yours.
yan Chan
Deputy Clerk
RC: RC
ccs: All Counsel
Hon. Laurie A. Hulin
Hon. Louis J. Perret
Hon. Renee R. Simien
15th Judicial District Court: 2013-4910
Court ofAppeal, Third Circuit: 2l-548
Please note Section 8 of Rule Vll of the Ilules of this Court provides that the anrrlicant or relator. as
the case mav be, must filc their bricfs on or before October -31.2022; and the rcspondent on or hcfore
November 18. 2022.
10/04/22

SUPREME COI.IITT OF LOT]ISIANA
No. 2022-C-00757
HIDDEN GROVE, LLC
VERSUS
RICHARD A. BRAUNS AND LESLIE BRAUNS
On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review
Fifteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Lafayette, No. 2013-4910;
Court of Appeal, Third Circuit. No.2l-548.
And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the
Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is
ordered that the writ ol review issue: that the District Court and the Court of
Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties
be notified."
Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby
commanded. in the name of the State olLouisiana and of this Honorable Court. to
send up forthwith to this Couft, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule l, at the
City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Court of the State ofLouisiana, on
this 4'h day of October, in the year of our
Lord. Two Thousand Twenty-Two.
Veronica O. Koclanes
Clerk of Court
Deputy Clerk of Court