Lashondra Jones v. Market Basket Stores, Inc.
Also decided on this docket: La., March 17, 2023
Lashondra Jones v. Market Basket Stores, Inc., No. 2022-C-00841 (La. Nov. 8, 2022).
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
November 08, 2022
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
LASHONDRA JONES
VS.
MARKET BASKET STORES, INC.
No. 2022-C-00841
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Lashondra Jones - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying For Writ Of Certiorari,
Parish of Calcasieu, 14th Judicial District Court Number(s) 2017- 3573, Court of
Appeal, Third Circuit, Number(s) 21-354;
_ _ _ _ _ _
November 08, 2022
Writ application granted - see briefing notice and Order.
JTG
JLW
JDH
SJC
WJC
JBM
PDG
11/08/2022 "See News Release 048 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
$nyrcmt 6,suil
STATE OF LOUISIANA
$etu 0rburs
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L, WEIMER
JUSTICES
WILLIAM J CRAIN
SCOTT J CRICHTON
JAMES T. GENOVESE
JAY B MCCALLUI\4
JEFFERSON D HUGHES III
PIPER O GRIFFIN
FirslOistrict
Second oistrict
Thrrd Dislnct
Fourth Disticl
Fiflh Drslncl
Seventh Drsticl
VERONICA O KOCLANES
CLERK OF COURT
400 Royal St. Suite 4200
NEW ORLEANS LA 70130-8102
TELEPHONE (504) 310,2300
HO[4E PAGE http //www lasc or9
Nol'ember 08.2022
2022-C-00841 LASHONDRA JONES VS. MARKET BASKET STORES.
INC.
NOTE: FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES WRIT GRANTED Novernber 08, 2022
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this
Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time
of oral argument will be mailed out.
Srxth Dlstrct
Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized
paper should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary
"Blueback" or other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that
counsel must file a brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of
Court.
It is further provided in Rule Vll, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be
deemed timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. lf the brief is received by mail on
the first legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable
presumption that it was timely filed. In all cases where the presumption does not apply,
the timeliness of the mailing shall be shown only by an otficial United States postmark or
by official receipt or certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide
commercial mail services such as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the
time of mailing which indicates the date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private
commercial mail meter stamp, or label from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used
to establish timeliness.
Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely iiled only
ifreceived by the clerk on or before the last day ofthe delay for filing.
Very truly yours.
LA_
AyanChan
With kindest regards. I rernain.
Deputl'CIerk
MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court rrrovides that the anrrlicant
or relator. as the case mav be, must file their briefs on or before December 5,2022t
and the respondent on or before December 23.2022.
11/08/22
RC: RC
ccs: Hon. Ronald F. Ware
Hon. H. Lynn Jones, II
Hon. Renee R. Simien
Jackson Torey Brown
Todd A. Townsley
Hannah Elizabeth Mayeaux
David Harmon Hanchey
Jordyn Angelle Goody
Van Clifton Seneca
l4th Judicial District Court: 2017-3573
Court of Appeal, Third Circuit: 2l-354
SUPRENIE COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 2022-C-008{l
LASHONDRA JONES
VEIISUS
MARKET I]ASKET STORES. INC.
On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review
Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, No. 2017-3573;
Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. 21-354.
And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the
Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the fbllowing order. to wit- "lt is
ordered that the writ of review issuel that the District Court and the Courl of
Appeal send up the record in Duplicate ofthe casel and that counsel for all parties
be notified."
Now, therefore. the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby
commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Couft, to
send up forthwith to this Court. in accordance with Supreme Court Rule l, at the
City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on
this 8'r' day of November, in the year of our
Lord, Two Thousand Twenty-Two.
Veronica O. Koclanes
Clerk of Court
Deputy Clerk of Court