Wilbert Jones v. State Of Louisiana
Also decided on this docket: La., May 5, 2023
Wilbert Jones v. State Of Louisiana, No. 2022-C-01455 (La. Jan. 11, 2023).
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
January 11, 2023
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
WILBERT JONES
VS.
STATE OF LOUISIANA
No. 2022-C-01455
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: State of Louisiana - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Writ Of Certiorari,
Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Number(s) 90052, Court of
Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2021 CA 1205;
_ _ _ _ _ _
January 11, 2023
Writ application granted - see briefing notice and Order.
SJC
JLW
JDH
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
01/11/2023 "See News Release 001 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No.2022-C-01455
WILBERT JONES
VERSUS
STATE OF LOUISIANA
On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review
Nineteenth Judicial District Couft, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 90052;
Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2021 CA 1205.
And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the
Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is
ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Couft of
Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parlies
be notified."
Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby
commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to
send up forthwith to this Couft, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the
City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on
this 11th day of January, in the year of our
Lord, Two Thousand Twenty-Three.
Veronica O. Koclanes
Clerk of Courl
Deputy Clerk of Court
01/11/23
fiuyrtmt [na*
STATE OF LOUISIANA
Sttu (Drleana
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L. WEIMER
JUSTICES
WILLIAM J. CRAIN
SCOTT J. CRICHTON
JAMES T. GENOVESE
JAY B, MCCALLUM
JEFFERSON D, HUGHES III
PIPER D. GRIFFIN
Sixth District
First District
Second District
Third District
Fourth District
Fifth Oistrict
Seventh District
VERONICA O, KOCLANES
CLERK OF COURT
400 Royal St., Suite 4200
NEW ORLEANS, LA 701 30.8102
TELEPHONE (504) 310-2300
HOME PAGE http.//www.tasc.org
January 11,2023
2022-C-0t455 WILBERT JONES VS. STATE, OF LOUISIANA
NOTE: FOR BzuEFING PURPOSES WRIT GRANTED January 11,2023
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this
Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time
of oral argument will be mailed out.
Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court nrovides that the applicant
or relator, as the case may be, must file their briefs on or before ebruary 6,2023; and
the respondent on or re February 27,2023.
Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs subrnitted on legal sized paper
should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or
other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a
brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Couft.
It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed
timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by rnail on the first
legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shallbe a rebuttable presumption that it
was tirnely filed. In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the
mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or
certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail services such
as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made atthe time ofmailing which indicates the
date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label
from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if
received by the clerk on or before the last day of the delay for filing.
With kindest regards, I remain,
V, truly yours,
an Chan
RC: RC
Deputy Clerk
MEMORANDUM TO COLINSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
ccs: All Counsel
Hon. Kellie E. Balfour
Hon. J. Douglas "Doug" Welborn
Hon. Rodd Naquin, Clerk
l9th Judicial District Court: 90052
Courl of Appeal, Firsr Circuitt 2021 CA 1205