Segal Radhi v. Christie Phuong Nguyen
Segal Radhi v. Christie Phuong Nguyen, No. 2022-C-0518 (La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. July 29, 2022).
Opinion text
SEGAL RADHI * NO. 2022-C-0518
VERSUS *
COURT OF APPEAL
CHRISTIE PHUONG NGUYEN, *
ET AL FOURTH CIRCUIT
*
STATE OF LOUISIANA
*******
APPLICATION FOR WRITS DIRECTED TO
CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH
NO. 2021-07974, DIVISION “B-5”
Honorable Rachael Johnson,
******
Judge Pro Tempore James F. McKay III
******
(Court composed of Judge Tiffany Gautier Chase, Judge Dale N. Atkins, Judge Pro
Tempore James F. McKay III)
MICHAEL BAGNERIS
935 Gravier St., Suite 2110
New Orleans, Louisiana
COUNSEL FOR APPILCANT/RELATOR
WRIT GRANTED; ORDER VACATED
JULY 29, 2022
JFM
TGC
DNA Segal Radhi (“relator”), seeks review of the district court’s July 20, 2022
order granting Christie Phuong Nguyen’s (“defendant”), motion for suspensive
appeal or extension of time for return date.
On June 1, 2022, the district court evicted the defendant. On July 5, 2022,
the district court signed the written judgment of eviction. The defendant did not
seek a timely suspensive appeal from either judgment. On July 19, 2022, the
defendant filed a motion for suspensive appeal of extension of time for return date.
La. C.C.P. art. 47351 governs appeals from evictions. The defendant failed
to appeal the judgment within twenty-four hours of the signed judgment of
eviction.
1 La. C.C.P. art. 4735 provides that:
An appeal does not suspend execution of a judgment of eviction unless the
defendant has answered the rule under oath, pleading an affirmative defense
entitling him to retain possession of the premises, and the appeal has been applied
for and the appeal bond filed within twenty-four hours after the rendition of the
judgment of eviction. The amount of the suspensive appeal bond shall be
determined by the court in an amount sufficient to protect the appellee against all
such damage as he may sustain as a result of the appeal.
1
The district court’s order granting the suspensive appeal, dated July 20,
2022, is defective on its face. Accordingly, we grant the writ and vacate the order
of suspensive appeal.
WRIT GRANTED; ORDER VACATED
2