State Of Louisiana v. Roderick White

Supreme Court of Louisiana
June 01, 2022
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
RODERICK WHITE
No. 2022-KH-00501
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N R E: Roderick White - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ,
Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Number(s) 01- 16-0114,
Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2021 KW 1417;
_ _ _ _ _ _
June 01, 2022
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JTG
JLW
SJC
WJC
JBM
PDG
06/01/2022 "See News Release 025 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

06/01/2022

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

No. 22-KH-0501

STATE OF LOUISIANA

v.

RODERICK WHITE

ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINETEENTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of
counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). As to his remaining claims, the claims are repetitive.
La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.