2022-KH-00840 Precedential Writ application denied. Processed

State Of Louisiana v. Jeffery Lynn Jones

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed January 25, 2023

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

  • 326 So. 3d 229 not in our corpus

Opinion text

Supreme Court of Louisiana
January 25, 2023
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
JEFFERY LYNN JONES
No. 2022-KH-00840
_ _ _ _
_ _
IN R
E: Jeffery Lynn Jones - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ,
Parish of Rapides, 9th Judicial District Court Number(s) 330,873, Court of Appeal,
Third Circuit, Number(s) KH 21-00774;
_ _ _ _ _ _
January 25, 2023
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
Griffin, J., would grant in part to order unsealing of jury polling slips. See Cade v.
State, 21-0660 (La. 10/19/21), 326 So.3d 229 (Griffin, J., additionally concurring).
JLW
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
01/25/2023 "See News Release 003 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

S
UPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No
. 22-KH-0840
S
TATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
J
EFFERY LYNN JONES
O
N SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RAPIDES
PE
R CURIAM:
D
enied. Applicant fails to show that he received ineffective assistance of
counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct.
2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). In addition, a portion of the application is repetitive.
La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.
01/25/23