State Of Louisiana v. Robert Kevin Mccartney
Also decided on this docket: La., May 31, 2023; La., March 7, 2023
State Of Louisiana v. Robert Kevin Mccartney, No. 2022-KH-00908 (La. Nov. 8, 2022).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State Ex Rel. Glover v. State 660 So. 2d 1189
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
November 08, 2022
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
ROBERT
KEVIN MCCARTNEY
No. 2022-KH-00908
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Robert Kevin McCartney - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory
Writ, Parish of Ra pides, 9th Judicial District Court Number(s) 234,925, Court of
Appeal, Third Circuit, Number(s) KH 22-00043;
_ _ _ _ _ _
November 08, 2022
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
SJC
JLW
JDH
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
11/08/2022 "See News Release 048 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
S
UPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No
. 22-KH-0908
S
TATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
RO
BERT KEVIN McCARTNEY
O
N SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE NINTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF RAPIDES
PE
R CURIAM:
D
enied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and
applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art.
930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
Applicant has now fully litigated several applications for post-conviction
relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244,
Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive
application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4
and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the
legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars
against successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully
litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter,
unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a
successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral
review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this
per curiam.
11/08/22