Pontchartrain Natural Gas System, k/d/s Promix, L.L.C., and Acadian Gas Pipeline System v. Texas Brine Company, LLC
Pontchartrain Natural Gas System, k/d/s Promix, L.L.C., and Acadian Gas Pipeline System v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, No. 2022CA0807 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. May 19, 2023).
Opinion text
A r a
1
r, " • aa a r . . •
t s
I! M, x.
TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC
µ d4 3udgment Rendered - MAY 19
2023 ON EL FROM
THE 23RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT CURT,
DIVISION ASSUMPTION PARISH,
LOUISIANA DOCKET NUMBER
4,
Leopold Z. Louisana a
Sher James M. a::! i
Garner Peter L.
Hilbert,
Jr.
Christopher aa ..; T.
a New Orleans.,
r Travis J.
Turner Gonzales,
Louisana
a Roy ' a et
ai Kent A.
Lambert Adam B.
Zuckerman
AdamsMat hew C.
Juneau Lauren
Brink New Orleans.,
Letm
This dispute is one of many arising out of the August 3, 2012 sinkhole that
I lIill I I I I I
WSTIZM-
1 111 I I I M I III 1: 1121 p RUE
I I
Mill
111111111, 1` 1
to the trial court.
by the same trial court, on the same day, but in a different docket number, i.e., Twenty -
1111111: I
P1111111
I" FIRINIRII: '
1 1 1 1,
1 1111; 111112 11 C'lglp 0
Is! 1311111. laiIiiiiiiiii Irn 1 ; Illirll
Ill ;
III " I IIIIll I1111111
1111HEI HIM ! 71111Ili I 0511 fl if ! IRII -
I- . I' I- 0.
481n.[MZ3
111pi riligrllpIlilill
M w= Kmzila litf!41 1 S
appealable judgment under La. C. C. P. art. 1915( B) and R.J. Messinger, Inc. v.
I In
After a thorough review of the record, we find no material distinction between the
I
1111111 1 I I I I I I I 1111 p I I Ilip I I p Ili I I
art. 1915( B) and Messinger Therefore, we lack subject matter jurisdiction over this
I After Crosstex 0832 was decided, this court decided Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas
Brine Company, LLC, 22- 1036 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 4/ 18/ 23), 5o. 3d , 2023 WL 2985097 ( Florida Gas
1036), and again considered another identical judgment by the same trial court, on the same day, in a
third trial court docket number, i.e., Twenty -Third JDC Docket No. 34, 316. As did the CrosstexO832Court
before it, the Florida Gas 1036 Court dismissed Texas Brine's appeal.
2
proceedings. We issue this summary disposition in accordance with Uniform Rules —
j- jq, 11
11 1171 FIT!
k ii I 51, 1171F 0 0
2 In light of this opinion and the parties' appearance at oral argument, we deny as moot Texas Brine' s
February 8, 2023 Motion to Remand Issues Presented by this Appeal and Cancel Oral Argument Due to
Improvident Granting of Article 1915( B) Certification, that was filed with this Court.
9