Martiza Rubio v. Allstate Insurance, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, Sylvia M. Champagne, and Justine P. Armstrong
Martiza Rubio v. Allstate Insurance, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, Sylvia M. Champagne, and Justine P. Armstrong, No. 2022CW0910 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Nov. 21, 2022).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
MARITZA RUBIO NO. 2022 CW 0910
VERSUS
ALLSTATE INSURANCE; STATE FARM
MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
COMPANY; SYLVIA M. CHAMPAGNE;
JUSTINE P. ARMSTRONG
CONSOLIDATED WITH
OLGA MEJIA
VERSUS
ALLSTATE INSURANCE; STATE FARM
MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
COMPANY; SYLVIA M. CHAMPAGNE;
JUSTINE P. ARMSTRONG
CONSOLIDATED WITH
LISSETTE MENENDEZ
VERSUS
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL
CONSOLIDATED WITH
JUSTINE P. ARMSTRONG
VERSUS ‘NOVEMBER 21, 2022
SYLVIA M. CHAMPAGNE & STATE FARM
MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
COMPANY
In Re: Sylvia M. Champagne and State Farm Mutual Automobile
Insurance Company, applying for supervisory writs,
23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension,
No. 130652 c/w 130654 c/w 130607 c/w 126046.
BEFORE : THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, Ju.
WRIT GRANTED IN PART; DENIED IN PART. The writ application
is granted for the sole purpose of striking the portion of the
district court’s June 27, 2022 judgment that reads “because the
sudden emergency doctrine does not apply in this matter.” This
writ application is denied in all other respects.
MRT
WRC
CHH
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
An)
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT