Jose Flores Moran v. Amtrust North America And Jacques- Imo Cafe, Llc
Also decided on this docket: La., October 20, 2023
Jose Flores Moran v. Amtrust North America And Jacques- Imo Cafe, Llc, No. 2023-C-00410 (La. June 21, 2023).
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
June 21, 2023
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
JOSE FLORES MORAN
VS.
AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA AND JACQUES-
IMO CAFE, LLC
No. 2023-C-00410
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Jose Flores Moran - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying For Writ Of Certiorari,
Office of Workers' Compensation, District 7, Number(s) 20-01982, Court of Appeal,
Fifth Circuit, Number(s) 22-CA-253;
_ _ _ _ _ _
June 21, 2023
Writ application granted - see briefing notice and Order.
PDG
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
06/21/2023 "See News Release 029 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
fiuyttme 6nu*
STATE OF LOUISIANA
$etu (Drleanr
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L WEIMER
JUSTICES
WILLIAM J CRAIN
SCOTT J CRICHTON
JAMES T GENOVESE
JAY B MCCALLUM
JEFFERSON O HUGHES III
PIPER D GRIFFIN
Firsl Oistrict
Second Oistncl
Thrrd Diskict
Fourth Diskict
Fifth Dislricl
Seventh Oistrict
VERONICA O KOCLANES
CLERK OF COURT
June21.2023
2023-C-004 l0 JOSE FLORES MORAN VS. AMTRUST NORTH
AMERICA, ET AL.
NOTE: FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES WRIT GRANTED June 2t,2023
MEMORANDLM TO COUNSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this
Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time
of oral argument will be mailed out.
Srxth District
Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper
should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or
other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a
brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Court.
It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed
timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first
legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it
was timely filed. In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the
mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or
certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail services such
as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time ofmailing which indicates the
date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label
from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if
received by the clerk on or before the last day ofthe delay for filing.
With kindest regards, I remain,
truly yours,
Ryan Chan
Deputl Clerk
RC: RC
400 Royal Sl . Suile 4200
NEW ORLEANS. LA 70130.8102
TELEPHONE (504) s10-2300
HO[.,|E PAGE http i/www.lasc.org
Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court provides that the applicant
or relator. as the case may be. must file their briefs on or before July 17.2023: and the
resnondent on or before August 7.2023.
06/21/23
All Counsel
Hon. Curtis Pursell, Clerk
Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit: 22-CA-253
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No.2023-C-00410
JOSE FLORES MORAN
VERSUS
AMTRUST NORTH AMERICA AND JACQUES-IMO CAFE, LLC
On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review
Office of Workers'Compensation, District 7, No. 20-01982;
Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 22-CA-253;
And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the
Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is
ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of
Appeal send up the rccord in Duplicate ofthe case; and that counsel for all parties
be notified."
Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby
send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule l, at the
City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of thc above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on
this 2l't day ofJune, in the year ofour Lord,
Two Thousand Twenty-Three.
Veronica O. Koclanes
Clerk of Court
Deputy Clerk of Court
commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to