Law Industries, Llc v. State Of Louisiana, Department Of Education, Recovery School District And Advanced Environmental Consulting, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana
October 10, 2023
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
LAW INDUSTRIES, LLC
VS.
STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION, RECOVERY SCHOOL
DISTRICT AND ADVANCED
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.
No. 2023-CC-00794
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Advanced Environmental Consulting, Inc. - Applicant Defendant; Applying
For Writ Of Certiorari, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court
Number(s) C-676,874, Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2023 CW 0143;
_ _ _ _ _ _
October 10, 2023
Writ application granted - see briefing notice and Order.
PDG
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
10/10/2023 "See News Release 043 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

pupremr 6.su*
STATE OF LOUISIANA
fretu (Drleans
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L. WEIMER
JUSTICES
WLLlAlv! J CRAIN
SCOTT J. CRICHTON
JAMES T. GENOVESE
JAY B, MCCALLUM
JEFFEFSON O, HUGHES XI
PIPEF D, GRIFFIN
Firsr Districl
Second District
Third Disrrict
Founh Disrrict
Fifth District
S6vonth District
Sixth District VERONICA O, KOCLANES
CLERK OF COURT
400 Roy8l Sr., Suit6 4200
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130.8102
TELEPHONE (504) 310-2300
HOlvlE PAGE httpi//www.lasc.org
October 10.2023
2023-CC-00794 LAW INDUSTRIES. LLC VS. STATE OF LOUISIANA,
ET AL.
NOTE:FOR BzuEFING PURPOSES WzuT GRANTED October 10,2023
MEMORANDLA4 TO COTINSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this
Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time
of oral argument will be mailed out.
Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court nrovides that the annlica n t
or relator. as the case may be. must file their briefs on or before November 6.2023:
and the respondent on or before November 24,2023.
Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper
should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or
other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a
brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Court.
It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed
timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first
legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it
was timely filed. In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the
mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or
certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail services such
as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time ofmailing which indicates the
date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label
from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Regards.
fira-lRv an Ch an
Deputy Clerk
Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if
received by the clerk on or before the last day ofthe delay for filing.
10/10/23

RC: RC
ccs: All Counsel
Hon. Richard M. Moore, III
Hon. J. Douglas "Doug" Welbom
Hon. Rodd Naquin, Clerk
I 9th Judicial District Cowt: C-67 6,87 4
Court of Appeal, First Circuit: 2023 CW 0143

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 2023-CC-00794
LAW INDUSTRIES, LLC
VERSUS
STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION,
RECOVERY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ADVANCED
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.
On Application for Writ of Certiorari
Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. C-676,874;
Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 22-CW-0143.
And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the
Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "lt is
ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of
Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all panies
be notified."
Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby
commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to
send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance "vith Supreme Court Rule i, at the
City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on
this lOth day of October, in the year of our
Lord, Two Thousand Twenty-Three.
Veronica O. Koclanes
Clerk of Court
Deputy Clerk of Court