James Self; Wilma Self v. Bpx Operating Company
Also decided on this docket: La., August 2, 2024; La., June 28, 2024
James Self; Wilma Self v. Bpx Operating Company, No. 2023-CQ-01242 (La. Dec. 5, 2023).
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
December 05, 2023
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
JAMES SELF; WILMA SELF
VS.
BPX OPERATING COMPANY
No. 2023-CQ-01242
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: James Self - Appellant Plaintiff; Wilma Self - Appellant Plaintiff; Certified
Question, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Number(s) 22-30243;
_ _ _ _ _ _
December 05, 2023
Certification granted. See briefing notice.
JDH
JLW
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
12/05/2023 "See News Release 052 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
$ayrtrrc 6,sart
STATE OF LOUISIANA
Netu (Drleans
CI-IIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L. WEIMEB
JUSTTCES
wlLLIAM J. CRAIN
SCOTT J, CRICHTON
JAI\,'ES T. GENOVESE
JAY B, MCCALLUM
JEFFERSON O, HUGHES III
PIPEB D. GRIFFIN
First Oistrict
Second Oistrict
Third District
Fourth District
Fifth District
S€v€nth District
400 Royal St., Suil6 4200
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130.8'I02
December 05.2023
2023-CQ-jt242 JAMES SELF; WILMA SELF VS. BPX OPERATING
COMPANY
FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES CERTIFICATION GRANTED: December 5,2023
MEMORANDUM TO COLINSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this
Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time
of oral argument will be mailed out.
Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper
should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or
other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a
brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Court.
It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed
timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first
legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it
was timely filed. In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the
mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or
certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail services such
as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing which indicates the
date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label
from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if
received by the clerk on or before the last day ofthe delay for filing.
Re
van Chan
Sixth Oistrict
ds
Depury'Clerk
VERONICA O, KOCLANES
CLEHK OF COURT
TELEPHONE (504) 310-2300
HOME PAGE h(p://www.lasc.org
Please note Section 6 of Rule XII of the Rules of this Court provides that appellant or
moving partv in the certifvins court must file its brief on or before January 4. 2024
and appellee or resoonding party in the certifying court on or before February 5.2024.
12/05/23
RC:RC
ccs: All Counsel
Hon. Lyle W. Cayce
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: 22-30243