State Of Louisiana v. Chad E. Jones
State Of Louisiana v. Chad E. Jones, No. 2023-KH-01701 (La. Apr. 23, 2024).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State Ex Rel. Glover v. State 660 So. 2d 1189
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
April 23, 2024
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
CHAD E. JONES
No. 2023-KH-01701
_ _
_ _ _ _
IN
RE: Chad E. Jones - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ, Parish
of Natchitoches, 10th Judicial District Court Number(s) C-15418, Court of Appeal,
Third Circuit, Number(s) KH 23-00194;
_ _ _ _ _ _
April 23, 2024
Writ application denied - See per curiam.
Genovese, J., would grant in part for the reasons assigned in State v. Reddick, 2021-
01893 (La. 10/21/22) 351 So.3d. 273.
Gr
iffin, J., would grant. See State v. Reddick, 2021-01893 (La. 10/21/22) 351 So.3d.
273. (
Griffin, J. dissenting).
JLW
JDH
SJC
WJC
JBM
04/23/2024 "See News Release 018 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 23-KH-1701
STATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
CHAD E. JONES
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TENTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF NATCHITOCHES
PER CURIAM:
Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and
applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art.
930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
Applicant has now fully litigated two applications for post -conviction relief
in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana
post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive
application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4
and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the
legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars
against successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully
litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter,
unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a
successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral
review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this
per curiam.
04/23/24