2023CA1186 Nonprecedential Affirmed Processed

Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed December 23, 2024

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

  • 317 So. 3d 715 not in our corpus
  • 317 So. 3d 323 not in our corpus
  • 324 So. 3d 1090 not in our corpus
  • 326 So. 3d 255 not in our corpus

Opinion text

9 0 0
1

STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST CIRCUIT

NUMBER 2023 CA 1186

by ORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC

VERSUS

TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC, ET AL.

Judgment Rendered:

Appealed from the
Twenty -Third Judicial District Court
In and for the Parish of Assumption
State of Louisiana
Suit Number 34, 316

Honorable Thomas J. Kliebert, Jr., Presiding

James M. Garner Counsel for Appellant/Defendant/
Jeffrey D. Kessler Third -Party Plaintiff
Martha Y. Curtis Texas Brine Company, LLC
Darnell Bludworth
Christopher T. Chocheles
New Orleans, LA

Robert Ryland Percy, III
Gonzales, LA

Travis J. Turner
Gonzales, LA

Roy C. Cheatwood Counsel for Appellee/Defendant/
Kent A. Lambert Third -Party Defendant
Adam B. Zuckerman Legacy Vulcan Corporation f/k/a
Leopoldo J. Yanez Vulcan Materials Company
Lauren Brink Adams
Matthew C. Juneau
Colleen C. Jarrott
New Orleans, LA

Antonio M. "Tony" Clayton
Port Allen, LA

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C. J., WOLFE AND MILLER, JJ.

GUIDRY, C. J.

This dispute is one of many arising out of the August 2012 sinkhole that

appeared near Bayou Come in Assumption Parish. Following the emergence of

the sinkhole, numerous lawsuits were filed by various parties against Texas Brine

Company, LLC (" Texas Brine"). Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC, one

of the several pipeline companies that sued Texas Brine, filed the instant suit under

docket number 34316. Texas Brine responded to the lawsuits by filing incidental

demands asserting tort and contract claims against various other parties, including

the third -party defendant/ appellee in this appeal, Legacy Vulcan, LLC f/k/a Legacy

Vulcan Corporation and/ or Vulcan Materials Company (" Legacy Vulcan"). A

more detailed discussion of the factual and procedural history of the litigation is

contained in Pontchartrain Natural Gas System v. Texas Brine Company, C,18-

1249 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 12/ 30/ 20), 317 So. 3d 715, 724, writ denied, 21- 00382 ( La.

6/ 8/ 21), 317 So. 3d 323 and Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas

Brine Company, LLC, 18- 1391 ( La. App. 1 st Cir. 5/ 3/ 21), 324 So. 3d 1090, writs

denied, 21- 00770, 21- 00773 ( La. 10/ 19/ 21), 326 So. 3d 255.

Due to the size and complexity of the litigation, the district court issued an

order in September 2016 outlining four phases of trial for the various claims raised.

Pontchartrain Natural Gas S sem, 18- 1249 at p. 6, 317 So. 3d at 725. Herein,

Texas Brine seeks review of the Phase 2 damages judgment,' as well as review of

several interlocutory judgments related thereto. Another panel of this court recently

decided an identical appeal involving the exact same judgment, parties, evidence,

1
On October 4, 2024, this panel issued an interim order questioning the validity of the Phase 2
judgment signed by the district court on December 1, 2022, which awards " tort" damages to
Texas Brine, but contains no liability decree for a tort claim. We therefore remanded this matter
to the district court to issue an amended judgment. The amended judgment signed by the district
court on October 29, 2024, does not differ in any material respect from the December 1, 2022
judgment. See Pontchartrain Natural Gas System v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, 23- 0986, p. 2
n. l ( La. App. 1st Cir. 12/ 12/ 24), _ So. 3d , 2024 WL 5084321 at * 1 n. l.

3

assignments of error, and factual and legal considerations.' See Pontchartrain

Natural Gas System v. Texas Brine Company_LLC, 23- 0986 ( La. App. 1st Cir.

12/ 12/ 24), _ So. 3d _, 2024 WL 5084321. Constrained by that opinion, we

adopt by reference the discussion of the procedural history and the evidence

presented in the Phase 2 proceedings, as well as the analysis of the issues raised on

appeal. Accordingly, for the reasons more fully set forth in Pontchartrain Natural

Gas System, _ So. 3d , 2024 WL 5084321, we issue the following

rulings.

We reverse the January 18, 2022 judgment granting Legacy Vulcan' s motion

for partial summary judgment and dismissing with prejudice Texas Brine' s claims

under the Amended Operating Agreement. Accordingly, we vacate the portion of

the October 29, 2024 judgment against Legacy Vulcan and in favor of Texas Brine

in the amount of $11, 896, 554. 80 and remand this matter to the district court for

further proceedings. We affirm the remaining portion of the October 29, 2024

judgment decreeing the amount of Texas Brine' s damages. Finally, we affirm the

following interlocutory judgments rendered by the district court in the course of

the proceedings below:

the January 18, 2022 judgment dismissing with prejudice Texas Brine' s

claims for double recovery of insured losses and liabilities;

the July 19, 2022 judgment dismissing with prejudice Texas Brine' s

claims against Legacy Vulcan for the alleged costs associated with

vendors, Commerce Title & Abstract Company and Right of Way

2 The other pipeline companies that also filed suit against Texas Brine are Pontchartrain Natural
Gas System, K/D/ S Promix, L.L.C. and Acadian Gas Pipeline, which filed suit under docket
number 34265, and Crosstex Energy Services, LP, Crosstex LIG, LLC, and Crosstex Processing
Services, LLC, which filed suit under docket number 34202. Appeals were filed in the three
separate " pipeline cases" following the joint Phase 2 damages trial.

M

Services, Inc., to recover closing costs and appraisal costs associated with

Texas Brine' s voluntary acquisition of properties;

the July 19, 2022 judgment dismissing with prejudice Texas Brine' s

claim against Legacy Vulcan for capitalized interest;

the April 26, 2022 judgment granting Legacy Vulcan' s motion to strike

all discovery and expert reports related to Texas Brine' s specific lost

opportunity claim regarding the sale of its Baytown and Napoleonville

properties;

the May 5, 2022 judgment dismissing with prejudice Texas Brine' s claim

under the Assignment of the Salt Lease; and

the July 19, 2022 judgment denying Texas Brine' s motion for partial

summary judgment regarding Legacy Vulcan' s liability as an intentional

tortfeasor.

We issue this memorandum opinion in accordance with Uniform Rules of

Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 2- 16. 1( B) and order Texas Brine Company, LLC

and Legacy Vulcan, LLC to bear their own costs on appeal.

JANUARY 18, 2022 PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR

OF LEGACY VULCAN, LLC IS REVERSED. THE PORTION OF THE

OCTOBER 29, 2024 JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF TEXAS BRINE

COMPANY, LLC AND AGAINST LEGACY VULCAN, LLC IN THE

AMOUNT OF $ 1198969554. 80 IS VACATED AND REMANDED. THE

PORTION OF THE OCTOBER 29, 2024 JUDGMENT DECREEING THE

AMOUNT OF TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC' S DAMAGES IS

AFFIRMED. ALL OTHER JUDGMENTS ON APPEAL ARE AFFIRMED.

5