Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC
Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, No. 2023CA1186 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Dec. 23, 2024).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 317 So. 3d 715 not in our corpus
- 317 So. 3d 323 not in our corpus
- 324 So. 3d 1090 not in our corpus
- 326 So. 3d 255 not in our corpus
Opinion text
9 0 0
1
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL
FIRST CIRCUIT
NUMBER 2023 CA 1186
by ORIDA GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, LLC
VERSUS
TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC, ET AL.
Judgment Rendered:
Appealed from the
Twenty -Third Judicial District Court
In and for the Parish of Assumption
State of Louisiana
Suit Number 34, 316
Honorable Thomas J. Kliebert, Jr., Presiding
James M. Garner Counsel for Appellant/Defendant/
Jeffrey D. Kessler Third -Party Plaintiff
Martha Y. Curtis Texas Brine Company, LLC
Darnell Bludworth
Christopher T. Chocheles
New Orleans, LA
Robert Ryland Percy, III
Gonzales, LA
Travis J. Turner
Gonzales, LA
Roy C. Cheatwood Counsel for Appellee/Defendant/
Kent A. Lambert Third -Party Defendant
Adam B. Zuckerman Legacy Vulcan Corporation f/k/a
Leopoldo J. Yanez Vulcan Materials Company
Lauren Brink Adams
Matthew C. Juneau
Colleen C. Jarrott
New Orleans, LA
Antonio M. "Tony" Clayton
Port Allen, LA
BEFORE: GUIDRY, C. J., WOLFE AND MILLER, JJ.
GUIDRY, C. J.
This dispute is one of many arising out of the August 2012 sinkhole that
appeared near Bayou Come in Assumption Parish. Following the emergence of
the sinkhole, numerous lawsuits were filed by various parties against Texas Brine
Company, LLC (" Texas Brine"). Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC, one
of the several pipeline companies that sued Texas Brine, filed the instant suit under
docket number 34316. Texas Brine responded to the lawsuits by filing incidental
demands asserting tort and contract claims against various other parties, including
the third -party defendant/ appellee in this appeal, Legacy Vulcan, LLC f/k/a Legacy
Vulcan Corporation and/ or Vulcan Materials Company (" Legacy Vulcan"). A
more detailed discussion of the factual and procedural history of the litigation is
contained in Pontchartrain Natural Gas System v. Texas Brine Company, C,18-
1249 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 12/ 30/ 20), 317 So. 3d 715, 724, writ denied, 21- 00382 ( La.
6/ 8/ 21), 317 So. 3d 323 and Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC v. Texas
Brine Company, LLC, 18- 1391 ( La. App. 1 st Cir. 5/ 3/ 21), 324 So. 3d 1090, writs
denied, 21- 00770, 21- 00773 ( La. 10/ 19/ 21), 326 So. 3d 255.
Due to the size and complexity of the litigation, the district court issued an
order in September 2016 outlining four phases of trial for the various claims raised.
Pontchartrain Natural Gas S sem, 18- 1249 at p. 6, 317 So. 3d at 725. Herein,
Texas Brine seeks review of the Phase 2 damages judgment,' as well as review of
several interlocutory judgments related thereto. Another panel of this court recently
decided an identical appeal involving the exact same judgment, parties, evidence,
1
On October 4, 2024, this panel issued an interim order questioning the validity of the Phase 2
judgment signed by the district court on December 1, 2022, which awards " tort" damages to
Texas Brine, but contains no liability decree for a tort claim. We therefore remanded this matter
to the district court to issue an amended judgment. The amended judgment signed by the district
court on October 29, 2024, does not differ in any material respect from the December 1, 2022
judgment. See Pontchartrain Natural Gas System v. Texas Brine Company, LLC, 23- 0986, p. 2
n. l ( La. App. 1st Cir. 12/ 12/ 24), _ So. 3d , 2024 WL 5084321 at * 1 n. l.
3
assignments of error, and factual and legal considerations.' See Pontchartrain
Natural Gas System v. Texas Brine Company_LLC, 23- 0986 ( La. App. 1st Cir.
12/ 12/ 24), _ So. 3d _, 2024 WL 5084321. Constrained by that opinion, we
adopt by reference the discussion of the procedural history and the evidence
presented in the Phase 2 proceedings, as well as the analysis of the issues raised on
appeal. Accordingly, for the reasons more fully set forth in Pontchartrain Natural
Gas System, _ So. 3d , 2024 WL 5084321, we issue the following
rulings.
We reverse the January 18, 2022 judgment granting Legacy Vulcan' s motion
for partial summary judgment and dismissing with prejudice Texas Brine' s claims
under the Amended Operating Agreement. Accordingly, we vacate the portion of
the October 29, 2024 judgment against Legacy Vulcan and in favor of Texas Brine
in the amount of $11, 896, 554. 80 and remand this matter to the district court for
further proceedings. We affirm the remaining portion of the October 29, 2024
judgment decreeing the amount of Texas Brine' s damages. Finally, we affirm the
following interlocutory judgments rendered by the district court in the course of
the proceedings below:
the January 18, 2022 judgment dismissing with prejudice Texas Brine' s
claims for double recovery of insured losses and liabilities;
the July 19, 2022 judgment dismissing with prejudice Texas Brine' s
claims against Legacy Vulcan for the alleged costs associated with
vendors, Commerce Title & Abstract Company and Right of Way
2 The other pipeline companies that also filed suit against Texas Brine are Pontchartrain Natural
Gas System, K/D/ S Promix, L.L.C. and Acadian Gas Pipeline, which filed suit under docket
number 34265, and Crosstex Energy Services, LP, Crosstex LIG, LLC, and Crosstex Processing
Services, LLC, which filed suit under docket number 34202. Appeals were filed in the three
separate " pipeline cases" following the joint Phase 2 damages trial.
M
Services, Inc., to recover closing costs and appraisal costs associated with
Texas Brine' s voluntary acquisition of properties;
the July 19, 2022 judgment dismissing with prejudice Texas Brine' s
claim against Legacy Vulcan for capitalized interest;
the April 26, 2022 judgment granting Legacy Vulcan' s motion to strike
all discovery and expert reports related to Texas Brine' s specific lost
opportunity claim regarding the sale of its Baytown and Napoleonville
properties;
the May 5, 2022 judgment dismissing with prejudice Texas Brine' s claim
under the Assignment of the Salt Lease; and
the July 19, 2022 judgment denying Texas Brine' s motion for partial
summary judgment regarding Legacy Vulcan' s liability as an intentional
tortfeasor.
We issue this memorandum opinion in accordance with Uniform Rules of
Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rule 2- 16. 1( B) and order Texas Brine Company, LLC
and Legacy Vulcan, LLC to bear their own costs on appeal.
JANUARY 18, 2022 PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR
OF LEGACY VULCAN, LLC IS REVERSED. THE PORTION OF THE
OCTOBER 29, 2024 JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF TEXAS BRINE
COMPANY, LLC AND AGAINST LEGACY VULCAN, LLC IN THE
AMOUNT OF $ 1198969554. 80 IS VACATED AND REMANDED. THE
PORTION OF THE OCTOBER 29, 2024 JUDGMENT DECREEING THE
AMOUNT OF TEXAS BRINE COMPANY, LLC' S DAMAGES IS
AFFIRMED. ALL OTHER JUDGMENTS ON APPEAL ARE AFFIRMED.
5