Carmen Nicholas v. Terry L. Bonnie
Carmen Nicholas v. Terry L. Bonnie, No. 2023CW0365 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Aug. 14, 2023).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Naghi v. Brener 17 So. 3d 919
- Schilling v. Bernhard Bros. Mechanical Contractors, LLC 186 So. 3d 658
- Saussy v. Bonin 129 So. 3d 537
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
CARMEN NICHOLAS NO. 2023 CW 0365
VERSUS
TERRY L. BONNIE AUGUST 14, 2023
In Re: Terry L. Bonnie, applying for supervisory writs, 19th
Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge,
No. 616866.
BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., LANIER, HESTER, GREENE AND MILLER, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The trial court's March 17, 2023 judgment
denying defendant's exception of peremption is reversed.
Plaintiff's petition was filed after the three-year peremptive
period for a legal malpractice action. La. R.S. 9:5605. Once
peremption occurred, plaintiff's claim was destroyed and the
2014 consent judgment purporting to establish defendant's
liability could not revive the extinguished claim. Cf. Naghi v.
Brener, 2008-2527 ( La. 6/26/09), 17 So.3d 919 ( holding where
expiration of the peremptive period for legal malpractice had
destroyed the cause of action there was nothing for an amended
petition to relate back to). Further, the 2014 consent judgment
granted only a partial summary judgment on the issue of
liability. As such, it was not a final judgment that would bar
defendant from raising the exception of peremption. See
Schilling v. Bernhard Bros . Mech. Contractors LLC, 2012- 210 5
La. App. 1st Cir. 9/13/13), 186 So.3d 658, 665, writ denied,
2013-2378 ( La. 12/6/13), 129 So.3d 537. Accordingly, the
exception of peremption filed by defendant, Terry L. Bonnie, is
granted and the claims asserted against him by plaintiff, Carmen
Nicholas, are dismissed with prejudice .
JMG
WIL
CHH
HG
Miller, J., dissents and would deny the writ.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT