2023KW0417 Nonprecedential Writ granted Processed

State Of Louisiana v. Rubin Wade

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed July 28, 2023

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

  • 351 So. 3d 273 not in our corpus
  • 360 So. 3d 273 not in our corpus
  • State v. Brumfield 16 So. 3d 1161

Opinion text

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2023 KW 0417

VERSUS

RUBIN WADE JULY 28, 2023

In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs,

19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton
Rouge, No. 11- 81- 0270.

BEFORE: HOLDRIDGE, CHUTZ, AND PENZATO, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The new rule of criminal procedure announced
in Ramos v. Louisiana, U. S. 1 140 S. Ct. 1390, 206 L. Ed. 2d
583 ( 2020), which provides for unanimity in jury verdicts is not
retroactive in Louisiana. State v. Reddick, 2021- 01893 ( La.
10/ 21/ 22), 351 So. 3d 273, 283. See also State v. Jackson, 2022-
00720 ( La. 5/ 16/ 23), 360 So. 3d 273 ( per curiam). The
defendant' s convictions became final in 1986. See La. Code
Crim. P. art. 922 ( B) . Accordingly, the district court' s order

overruling the procedural objection of untimeliness to
defendant' s application for postconviction relief, filed in
February 2021, and directing the district attorney to file an

answer on the merits is reversed. See La. Code Crim. P. art.

930. 8( A)( 2). Therefore, the application for postconviction

relief is hereby dismissed. See State v. Brumfield, 2009- 1084
La. 9/ 2/ 09), 16 So. 3d 1161, 1162.

Mil

am-

Holdridge, J., concurs. This action does not prevent the
defendant from requesting postconviction relief and a
raising
constitutional challenge to his conviction upon a showing that
his conviction by a non - unanimous jury was due to racial animus
or that the jurors voting not guilty had a valid basis to find
that the defendant was not proven guilty beyond a reasonable

doubt from the evidence presented. State v. Reddick, 2021- 01893
La. 10/ 21/ 22), 351 So. 3d 273. ( Genovese, J., in
dissenting
part; Griffin, J., dissenting)

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT