State Of Louisiana v. Ruben Van Dyke

aA
L1101t*

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

COMZECTED ACTION

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2023 KW 0601

VERSUS

RUBEN VAN DYKE

AUGUST 17, 2023

In Re: Ruben Van Dyke, applying for supervisory writs, 19th
Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge,
No. 05- 13- 0002.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, RESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include
a file -stamped copy of the application for postconviction

relief, the district court' s ruling, the State' s response, if
any, the bill of information, the commitment order, the trial
transcript, pertinent district court minutes, and any other

portion of the district court record that might support the
claims raised in the writ application. Therefore, this court

cannot adequately review the ruling at issue herein.
Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application

for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of

Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event

relator elects to file a new application with this court, he may
do so without the necessity of obtaining a return date. Any
future filing on this issue should include the entire contents

of this application, the missing items noted above, and a copy
of this ruling.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

UI EPUTYCLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2023 KW 0601

VERSUS

RUBEN VAN DYKE AUGUST 23, 2023

In Re: Ruben Van Dyke, applying for supervisory writs, 19th
Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge,

No. 05- 13- 0002-.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include
a file -stamped copy of the application for postconviction

relief, the district court' s ruling, the State' s response, if

any, the bill of information, the commitment order, the trial

transcript, pertinent district court minutes, and any other

portion of the district court record that might support the
claims raised in the writ application. Therefore, this court

cannot adequately review the ruling at issue herein.
Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application

for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of

Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event

relator elects to file a new application with this court, he may
do so without the necessity of obtaining a return date. Any
future filing on this issue should include the entire contents

of this application, the missing items noted above, and a copy
of this ruling.

PMC

CHH
SMM