State Of Louisiana v. Cody C. Kahl
State Of Louisiana v. Cody C. Kahl, No. 2023KW0910 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Oct. 23, 2023).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Cole v. ST. FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. 433 So. 2d 710
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2023 KW 0910
VERSUS
CODY KAHL OCTOBER 23, 2023
Kahl, for supervisory writs, 21st
In Re: Cody applying
Judicial District Court, Parish of Livingston, No.
43346.
BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE, AND WOLFE, JJ.
WRITNOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to comply with Uniform
Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 13, 4- 2, and 4- 3,
by failing to provide this court with evidence of a timely filed
notice of intent, documentation of a return date set by the
filed extension to the return
district court, and/ or a timely
date. in violation of Rules 4- 5 ( B) , ( C) ( 8) , and
Additionally,
10), relator' s application was not properly bound, relator
failed to provide this court with a copy of the bill of
information or indictment, and failed to attach any pertinent
court minutes. Furthermore, although it is not a violation of
the Uniform Rules, relator failed to provide this court with a
transcript of the hearing on the motion to
suppress
copy of the
and exhibits, if any, introduced at the hearing, which would be
necessary to review his claims. See City of Baton Rouge v.
Plain, 433 So. 2d 710 ( La.), cert. denied, 464 U. S. 896, 104
S. Ct. 246, 78 L. Ed. 2d 235 ( 1983). Supplementation of this writ
application and/ or an application for rehearing will not be
considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal,
Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event relator elects to file a new
application with this court, the application must be filed on or
before November 27, 2023. Any future filing on this issue
should include the entire contents of this application, the
missing item( s) noted above, and a copy of this ruling.
JEW
GH
EW