State Of Louisiana v. James A. Blake
State Of Louisiana v. James A. Blake, No. 2023KW0949 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Oct. 13, 2023).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- State v. Cheatham 877 So. 2d 164
- Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp. 904 So. 2d 717
- State v. Freeman 427 So. 2d 1161
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2023 KW 0949
VERSUS
JAMES A. BLAKE OCTOBER 13, 2023
In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs,
20th Judicial District Court, Parish of West
Feliciana, No. 23- WFLN- 41.
BEFORE: WELCH, HOLDRIDGE,, AND WOLFE, JJ.
WRIT DENIED.
JEW
GH
Wolfe, J., dissents and would grant the writ application.
The defendant bears the burden of persuasion by a preponderance
of the evidence in non - homicide cases involving self- defense.
See State v. Cheatham, 38, 413 ( La. App. 2nd Cir. 6/ 23/ 04), 877
So. 2d 164, 172- 73, writ denied, 2004- 2224 ( La. 6/ 24/ 05), 904
So. 2d 717. in non - homicide cases where self- defense is raised, a
1,
ua.1 inquiry --,.
s required; " an objective inquiry into whether the
force used was reasonable under the circumstances; and
subjective inquiry into wnether the force used was apparently
necessary." See State v. Freeman, 427 So. 2d 1161, 1163 ( La.
1983). if the burden of on , was
persuasion placed on the State t.o
disprove the subjective
Ct' Lve influences, the State would bear an
onerous burden " since ` Lt would only be the defendant who has
these facts at his disposal
S.fDOsal to produce to the court." See
Cheatham, 877 So. 2d at 17-3).