Louisiana Board Of Ethics In The Matter Of Michelle Barnett
Also decided on this docket: La., October 25, 2024
Louisiana Board Of Ethics In The Matter Of Michelle Barnett, No. 2024-C-00500 (La. June 25, 2024).
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
June 25, 2024
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS IN
THE MATTER OF MICHELLE
BARNETT
No. 2024-C-00500
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Michelle Barnett - Applicant Other; Applying For Writ Of Certiorari, State
of Louisiana Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board Number(s)
2015-0662, Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2023 CA 0321;
_ _ _ _ _ _
June 25, 2024
Writ application granted - see briefing notice and Order.
JDH
JLW
SJC
JTG
WJC
JBM
PDG
06/25/2024 "See News Release 030 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
fiuyrtrce Aufr
STATE OF LOUISIANA
,Netu (Drleung
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L, WEIMER
JUSTICES
WILLIAM J, CRAIN
SCOTT J, CRICHTON
JAMES T. GENOVESE
JAY B. I\,,ICCALLUM
JEFFERSON HUGHES
PIPER O, GRIFFIN
First Diskict
Second Disrricr
Third District
Fourth 0istrict
Fifth Oistrict
Seventh District
VEFONICA O, KOCLANTS
CLERK OF COURT
400 Eoyal St., Suite 4200
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70130.8102
TELEPHONE (504) 310,2300
HOI!4E PAGE httpr/www.lasc.org
lune 25,2024
2024-C-00500 LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS IN THE MATTER OF
MICHELLE BARNETT
NOTE: FOR BRIEFING PTIRPOSES WzuT GRANTED June 25,2024
MEMORANDUM TO COLINSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this
Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time
of oral argument will be mailed out.
Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court Drovides that the applicant
Sixrh Distiict
or relator, as the case may be, must file their briefs o4 or before July 22,2024: and the
respondent on or before August 9,2024.
It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed
timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first
legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it
was timely filed. In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the
maiiing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or
cerlificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail seruices such
as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing which indicates the
date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label
from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Briefs forwardeC by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if
received by the clerk on or before the last day ofthe delay for filing.
Regards,
Ryan Chan
Deputy Clerk
RC: RC
ccs: A1l Counsel
Hon. Gregory lt{cDonald
Oral argument rvill be waived if brief is untimely fited. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper
should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or
other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a
brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Court.
06/25/24
Sabra Matheny, Director of the Division of Administrative Law
Hon. Rodd Naquin, Clerk
State of Louisiana Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board: 2015-0662 -
Div:B
Court of Appeal, First Circuit: 2023 CA032l
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 2024-C-00500
LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS IN THE MATTER
OF MICHELLE BARNETT
On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review
State of Louisiana Division of Administrative Law Ethics Adjudicatory Board,
No. 2015-0662; Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2023 CA 0321.
And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the
ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of
Appeal send up the record in Duplicate ofthe case; and that counsel for all parties
be notified."
Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby
commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Courl, to
send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule 1, at the
City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Court of the State ofLouisiana, on
this 25th day ofJune, in the year ofour
Lord, Two Thousand Twenty-Four.
Veronica O. Koclanes
Clerk of Court
Deputy Clerk of Court
Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "lt is