23rd Psalm Trucking, L.L.C. v. Madison Parish Police Jury

Supreme Court of Louisiana
December 11, 2024
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
23RD PSALM TRUCKING, L.L.C.
VS.
MADISON PARISH POLICE JURY
No. 2024-C-00808
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: 23rd Psalm Trucking, L.L.C. - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying For Writ Of
Certiorari, Parish of Madison, 6th Judicial District Court Number(s) 2020132, Court
of Appeal, Second Circuit, Number(s) 55,658-CA;
_ _ _ _ _ _
December 11, 2024
Writ application granted - see briefing notice and Order.
PDG
JLW
JDH
SJC
JTK
WJC
JBM
12/11/2024 "See News Release 055 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

fiaytrzme Asufi
STATE OF LOUISIANA
fietu (Drlaanr
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L. WEIMER
JUSTICES
wlLLIAM J. CFAIN
SCOTT J, CHICHTON
JEANNETTE T, KNOLL
JAY 8. MCCALLUM
JEFFENSON HUGHES
PIPER D, GRIFFIN
First District
Second Districr
Third Oistrict (pro
Fourth Oistrict
Fifth Districr
Seventh Oistrict
VENONICA O. KOCLANES
CLFRK OF COURT
400 Royal St., Suit6 4200
NEW ORLEANS. LA 70130,8102
TELEPHONE (504) 310,2300
HOME PAGE http/www.lasc.org
December 11,2024
2024-C-00808 23RD PSALM TRUCKING. L.L.C. VS. MADISON
PAzuSH POLICE JURY
NOTE: FOR BRIEFING PURPOSES WzuT GRANTED December 11,2024
MEMORANDUM TO COUNSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this
Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time
of oral argument will be mailed out.
Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper
should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or
other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a
brief. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Court.
It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed
timely filed if mailed on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first
legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it
was timely filed. In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the
mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or
certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail services such
as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing which indicates the
date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label
from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if
received by the clerk on or before the last day ofthe delay for filing.
Regards,
van Chan
Sixth 0istrict
RC: RC
Deputy Clerk
Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court provides that the applicant
or relator. as the case mav be. must file their briefs on or before January 6.2025: and
the respondent on or before January 27,2025.
12/11/24

ccs: All Counsel
Hon. Laurie Reis Brister
Hon. Marion Hopkins
Hon. Robin Norman Jones
6th Judicial District Court: 2020132 - JDC:6th Div:B
Court of Appeal, Second Circuit: 55,658-CA

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 2024-C-00808
23RD PSALM TRUCKING, L.L.C.
VERSUS
MADISON PARISH POLICE JURY
On Writ of Certiorari and/or Review
Sixth Judicial District Court, Parish of Madison, No. 2020132,
Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, No. 55,658-CA.
And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, ofthe
Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is
ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of
Appeal send up the record in Duplicate of the case; and that counsel for all parties
Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby
commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court, to
send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule l, at the
City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on
this 1 lth day of December, in the year of our
Lord, Two Thousand Twenty-Four.
Veronica O. Koclanes
Clerk of Court
uty Clerk of Court
be notified."