State Of Louisiana v. John Noehl And Analise Noehl

Supreme Court of Louisiana
February 05, 2025
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
JOHN NOEHL AND ANALISE NOEHL
No. 2024-KK-01224
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: State of Louisiana - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory Writ,
Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court Number(s) DC -23-01215,
Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2024 KW 0481;
_ _ _ _ _ _
February 05, 2025
Writ application granted - see briefing notice and Order.
JBM
JLW
JDH
JTK
WJC
PDG
JMG
02/05/2025 "See News Release 003 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

$aprrmo 6twl
STATE OF LOUISIANA
Xrtu (Drleans
CHIEF JUSTICE
JOHN L, WEIMER
JUSTICES
WILLIAM J, CRAIN
JOHN MICHAEL GUIORY
JEANNETTE T. KNOLL
JAY B, MCCALLUI\4
JEFFERSON HUGHES
PIPER D- GRIFFIN
VERONICA O. KOCLANES
CLERK OF COUBT
400 Royal St., Suite 4200
NEW ORLEANS, LA 70'I3O-8102
TELEPHONE (s04) 310-2300
HOME PAGE http://vww.lasc.orq
February 05,2025
2024-KK-01224 STATE OF LOUISIANA VS. JOHN NOEHL AND
ANALISE NOEHL
NOTE: FOR BzuEFING PURPOSES WRIT GRANTED February 05,2025
MEMORANDUM TO COLINSEL IN CAPTIONED CASE:
Please be advised that the above-captioned matter will be set for oral argument on this
Court's next available docket. A copy of the official docket with the specific date and time
of oral argument will be mailed out.
Please note Section 8 of Rule VII of the Rules of this Court rrrovides that the aprrlicant
or relator. as the case mav be. must file their briefs on or before March 3, 2025; and
Sixth Dlstrict
the resDondent on or before March 24,2025.
Oral argument will be waived if brief is untimely filed. Briefs submitted on legal sized paper
should be fastened at the top. All briefs should be backed with the customary "Blueback" or
other flexible material. In criminal proceedings, the court directs that counsel must file a
brief'. Failure to do so may subject counsel to a penalty of contempt of Court.
It is further provided in Rule VII, Section 9 that briefs sent through the mail shall be deemed
timely filed if maiied on or before the due date. If the brief is received by mail on the first
legal day following the expiration of the delay, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that it
was timely filed. In all cases where the presumption does not apply, the timeliness of the
mailing shall be shown only by an official United States postmark or by official receipt or
certificate from the United States Postal Service, or bona fide commercial mail services such
as Federal Express or United Parcel Service, made at the time of mailing which indicates the
date thereof. Any other date stamp, such as a private commercial mail meter stamp, or label
from an Automated Postal Center, shall not be used to establish timeliness.
Briefs forwarded by private delivery or courier service shall be deemed timely filed only if
received by the clerk on or before the last day ofthe delay for filing.
Regards,
an Chan
RC: RC
ccs: All Counsel
Hon. Fred Crifasi
Depulv Clerk
Firsr Disrricl
Second Oisrrict
Third District (pro
Fourth District
Fifth Distlict
Sevenrh Oislrict
02/05/25

Hon. J. Douglas "Doug" Welborn
Hon. Rodd Naquin, Clerk
l9th Judicial District Court: DC-23-01215 - JDC
Court of Appeal, First Circuit: 2024KW 0481
l9th Dir.:l

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 2024-KK-0122,1
STATE OF LOUISIANA
vs.
JOHN NOEHL AND ANALISE NOEHL
On Supervisory Writ and/or Remedial Writs
l9th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. DC-23-01215;
Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2024 KW 0481.
And, whereas, the Court has this date, pursuant to Article 5, Section 5, of the
Constitution of Louisiana, made and issued the following order, to wit- "It is
ordered that the writ of review issue; that the District Court and the Court of
Appeal send up the record in Duplicate ofthe case; and that counsel for all parties
be notified."
Now, therefore, the said District Court and the Court of Appeal is hereby
commanded, in the name of the State of Louisiana and of this Honorable Court. to
send up forthwith to this Court, in accordance with Supreme Court Rule l, at the
City of New Orleans, the record in duplicate of the above-entitled case.
Witness the Honorable Justices of the
Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, on
this 5th day ofFebruary, in the year ofour
Lord, Two Thousand Twen8-Five.
Veronica O. Koclanes
Clerk of Court
Deputy Clerk of Court