Sharon Lewis v. Louisiana State University; Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University; Garrett "Hank" Danos, in his Individual and Official Capacity; Robert "Bobby" Yarborough, in his Individual and Official Capacity; Stanely Jacobs, in his Individual and Offici

SHARON LEWIS NO. 2024 CW 0413

VERSUS

LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, JULY 8, 2024
ET AL

In Re: Sharon Lewis, for supervisory writs, 19th
applying
Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge,

No. 708082.

BEFORE: WOLFE, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator has improperly requested

supervisory review of multiple orders in a single writ

application. Although there is no explicit statutory
prohibition against challenging multiple orders in a single writ
application, the Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal,

Rules 4- 2 and 4- 5( C) refer only to the " ruling . . . at issue"
and the " ruling complained of." Therefore, we decline to

consider multiple judgments in a single writ application. See

Succession of Burgo, 2019- 0612 ( La. App. lst Cir. 8/ 5/ 19), 2019
WL 3574213 ( unpublished).

The writ application also does not include a copy of the court

minutes from the February 21, 2024 and March 27, 2024

contradictory hearings, nor does it include the exhibits

attached to the parties' filings related to the motions at issue
in this writ application. See Rule 4- 5( C) ( 8) & ( 10), Uniform

Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal. This court also requires a
transcript of the February 21, 2024 and March 27, 2024

contradictory hearings and any evidence introduced during the

hearings.

Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application

for rehearing will not be considered. Rules 4- 9 and 2- 18. 7,
Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal.

In the event relator seeks to file new applications with this
court, such applications must contain all pertinent

documentation and must comply with Rule 2- 12. 2, Uniform Rules of
Louisiana Courts of Appeal. Any new applications must be filed
on or before August 9, 2024, and must contain a copy of this

ruling.

EW
CHH
SMM

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT