2024CW0602 Nonprecedential Processed

Patricia Grant, Richard Grant, Marguerite Guarino, William Guarino, Sheron Sprawls, Vernon Sprawls, Dianne Widte, Johnny White, Jo Ann Youngblood, William Youngblood, Lynell Rowan, Alvin Rowin, Gayle Ayo, James A. Yo, Deborah Lascari and Daniel Lascari an v. Sun Construction, LLC, Penn Mill Lakes, LLC, Sunrise Construction and Development, LLC and Cooper Engineering, Inc., A Professional Engineering Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed September 9, 2024

Opinion text

0

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

APRIL MARKIEWICZ, WIFE OF/ AND NO. 2024 CW 0602
MARK MARKIEWICZ
PAGE 1 OF 2
VERSUS

SUN CONSTRUCTION, LLC, AND

COOPER ENGINEERING, INC., A

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING
CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED WITH

JANET SHEA, WIFE OF/ AND ALPHONSE
SHEA

VERSUS

SUN CONSTRUCTION, LLC, PENN MILL

LAKES, LLC, SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION
AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND COOPER

ENGINEERING, INC., A

PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING
CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED WITH

PATRICIA GRANT, RICHARD GRANT,
MARGUERITE GUARINO, WILLIAM

GUARINO, SHERON SPRAWLS, VERNON

SPRAWLS, DIANNE WIDTE, JOHNNY

WHITE, JO ANN YOUNGBLOOD,
WILLIAM YOUNGBLOOD, LYNELL
ROWAN, AL VIN ROWIN, GAYLO AYO,

JAMES AYO, DEBORAH LASCARI AND
DANIEL LASCARI AND ON BEHALF OF
ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED

VERSUS

SUN CONSTRUCTION, LLC, PENN MILL
LAKES, LLC, SUNRISE CONSTRUCTION
AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND COOPER
SEPTEMBER 9, 2024
ENGINEERING, INC., A
PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING
CORPORATION

In Re: Lawrence Kornman, Sun Construction, LLC, and Penn Mill

Lakes, LLC, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd
Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No.

200610684 c/ w 200810737 c/ w 200811536.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The portion of the district court' s

February 21, 2024 judgment which ordered that the motion for
summary judgment filed by defendant, is Lawrence Kornman, is moot
vacated. According to the district court' s reasons for judgment,
it found the motion for summary judgment moot based upon

NO. 2024 CW 0602

PAGE 2 OF 2

the grant of the exception of no cause of action. However, it
appears that the motion for summary judgment sought the dismissal
of claims other than the claims at issue in the exception of no
cause of action.
Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the

district court with instructions to rule on the motion for summary
judgment filed by defendant, Lawrence Kornman.

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DUTY CLERK OF' COURT
FOR THE COURT