Wholesale Electric Supply Company, A Branch of Wholesale Electric Supply Co. of Houston, Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc.
Wholesale Electric Supply Company, A Branch of Wholesale Electric Supply Co. of Houston, Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc., No. 2024CW0893 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Dec. 23, 2024).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Southside Civic Ass'n v. Warrington 635 So. 2d 721
- Southside Civic Ass'n, Inc. v. Warrington 639 So. 2d 1168
Opinion text
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
WHOLESALE ELECTRIC SUPPLY NO. 2024 CW 0893
COMPANY, A BRANCH OF
WHOLESALE ELECTRIC SUPPLY
CO. OF HOUSTON, INC.
VERSUS
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL,
INC.
DECEMBER 23, 2024
In Re: Vector Electric & Controls, Inc., for
applying
supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, Parish
of East Baton Rouge, No. 630, 349.
BEFORE: MCCLENDON, WELCH, AND LANIER, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. After de novo review,
we find that the claims
asserted in Vector Electric & Controls,
Inc.'
Vector s original reconventional
due to the demand were for losses suffered by
mismanagement of the Baton Rouge construction
projects by Honeywell International, Inc. and prayed for relief
based thereon. Therefore,
any claims or allegations asserted in
the
Out firstHoneywell'
of supplemental
s and amended reconventional demand arising
alleged mismanagement of the Baton Rouge
projects relate
demand. See back to Vector' s originally filed reconventional
Scaglione v. Juneau, 2010- 1734 ( La. 7/ 27/ 10),
127 ( 40 So. 3d
per curiam); and Southside Civic Association, Inc. v.
Warrington, 93- 0890 ( La. 1st
App. Cir. 4/ 8/ 94), 635 So. 2d 721,
724, writ denied, 94- 1219 ( La. 7/ 1/ 94), 639 So. 2d 1168. However,
the claims
regarding the Geismar construction project were not
asserted in the original reconventional demand. Accordingly, the
writ is denied in part as to
all claims related to the Geismar
project. However,
the portion of the July 22, 2024 judgment that
granted theandexception
reversed, of peremption as to the remaining claims is
the exception
of peremption is denied as to those
remaining claims in Vector' s first supplemental and amended
reconventional demand.
Pmc
JEW
WIL
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
TY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT