Jesus Alberto Fonseca Bonilla v. Brooklyn N. Eccles
Jesus Alberto Fonseca Bonilla v. Brooklyn N. Eccles, No. 2024CW0966 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Nov. 19, 2024).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Herlitz Const. Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc. 396 So. 2d 878
- 878 La. 1981 not in our corpus
Opinion text
JESUS ALBERTO FONSECA NO. 2024 CW 0966
BONILLA
VERSUS
BROOKLYN N. ECCLES NOVEMBER 19, 2024
In Re: Brooklyn N. Eccles, applying for supervisory writs,
Family Court in and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge,
No. 225473.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND LANIER, JJ.
WRIT DENIED. The criteria set forth in Herlitz Construction
Co., Inc. v. Hotel Investors of New Iberia, Inc., 396 So. 2d 878
La. 1981) ( per curiam), are not met.
McClendon, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. The
district court granted this motion in part when the court ordered
Brooklyn Eccles to respond only to numbers four and five of the
requests. Pursuant to ' La. Code Civ. P. art. 1469( 4) when a motion
is granted in part and denied in part, the court may apportion the
reasonable expenses incurred in relation to the motion among the
parties and persons in a just manner. I find the district court
should have considered that it partially granted the motion to
compel when it awarded Jesus Alberto Fonseca Bonilla attorney' s
fees and costs in the amount of $ 2, 949. 29. Therefore, I would
vacate that portion of the judgment and remand this matter to the
district court to consider the award of reasonable expenses in
accordance with La. Code Civ. P. art. 1469( 4) In all other
respects, I concur with denial of the writ.
URT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
PUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT