2024KW0839 Nonprecedential Writ not considered Processed

State Of Louisiana v. Johnathan Jerrell Calcota

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed December 16, 2024

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

lug

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2024 KW 0839

VERSUS

JOHNATHAN JERRELL CALCOTA DECEMBER 16, 2024

In Re: Johnathan Jerrell Calcota, applying for supervisory
writs, 21st Judicial District Court, Parish of

Tangipahoa, No. 2202740.

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C. J., PENZATO AND STROMBERG, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. All Uniform Rules relative to a

document' s content and format, except for provisions requiring
binding, are applicable to documents to be EFiled. See Local Rule
2( D). Counsel
failed to comply with Uniform Rules of Louisiana
Courts of Appeal,
Rule 4- 5( B), by failing to include in the
affidavit the telephone numbers for the judge and opposing counsel
and by failing to consecutively number the pages of the writ
application.
Counsel also failed to comply with Rule 4- 5( C) ( 3),
5) and ( 10), by failing to include in the statement of the case
the status of the case, assignments or specifications of error,

and all the pertinent criminal court minutes. Moreover, although

it is not a rule violation, we note that counsel failed to include
a copy of the transcript of the proceedings held on April 9, 2024

and a copy of any exhibits introduced at the hearing. See City of
Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So. 2d 710 ( La.), cert. denied, 464 U. S.
896, 104 S. Ct. 246, 78 L. Ed. 2d 235 ( 1983). Supplementation of

this writ application and/ or an application for rehearing will not
be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal,
Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9.
Any future filing on this issue should include
the entire contents of this application, the Missing items noted
above,
and a copy of this ruling.

Guidry, J., would grant the writ application.

OURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DOPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT