State Of Louisiana v. Joshua Washington
State Of Louisiana v. Joshua Washington, No. 2025 KW 0936 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Oct. 9, 2025).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Cole v. ST. FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. 433 So. 2d 710
Opinion text
_ STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISTANA NO. 2025 KW 0936
VERSUS
JOSHUA D. WASHINGTON OCTOBER 9, 2025
In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs, 20th
Judicial District Court, Parish of West Feliciana, No.
25-WFLN-013.
BEFORE : LANIER, WOLFE, AND HESTER, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Counsel failed to include an Affidavit
verifying the allegations of the petition with service information
for the respondent judge. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts
of Appeal, Rule 4-5(A). Counsel failed to comply with the
requirements of the Rules 4-4 and 4-5(C) (12) concerning requests
for expedited consideration and the page numbering requirements of
Rule 4-5(B). Counsel also failed to comply with Rules 4-5(C) (5)
and (10), by failing to designate an assignment of error and
include all the pertinent court minutes. Moreover, although it is
not a violation of the Uniform Rules, we note that counsel failed
to include a copy of the officer’s body camera footage that was
considered by the court at the hearing held on the motion to
suppress evidence. See City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So.2d
710 (La.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 896, 104 S.Ct. 246, 78 L.Ed.2d
235 (1983). Supplementation of this writ application and/or an
application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform
Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9. Any
future filing on this issue should include the entire contents of
this application, the missing items noted above, and a copy of
this ruling.
WIL
EW
CHH
“QURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
IRT
PLA sw 4CM
PUTY CLERK OF COU
FOR THE COURT