State of Louisiana v. Steven C. Perry

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2025 KW 0955

VERSUS

STEVEN C. PERRY NOVEMBER 26, 2025

In Re: Steven C. Perry, applying for supervisory writs,

Ascension Parish Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 634673.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, C. J., GREENE AND STROMBERG, JJ.

WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to comply with Uniform
Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4- 3 and 4- 5( C)( 11), by
failing to include an extension of the return date order, which

requires the application to be filed in this court on or before
September 19, 2025, therefore this writ application appears

untimely. Relator failed to comply with Rules B) in 4- 5( A) and (

that the application does not contain an affidavit verifying the
allegations of the petition and that service was made, it is not

properly bound, and the pages are not consecutively numbered.

Relator also failed to comply with Rules 4 - 5 ( C) ( 1) , ( 4) , ( 6) , ( 9) ,
and ( 10), by failing to include an index, issues and questions of
law, the judgment or ruling complained of, any opposition or

written statement that no opposing written opposition was filed,
and the pertinent court minutes. Moreover, although it is not a

violation of the Uniform Rules, we note that relator failed to
include a copy of the bench trial transcript and a copy of any
exhibits introduced at trial. See City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So. 2d 710 ( La. 1983) , cert. denied, 464 U. S. 896, 104 S. Ct.
246, 8 L. Ed. 2d 235 ( 1983) ; La. Code Crim. P. art. 912. 1 ( C) ( 1) .
Supplementation of this writ application and/ or an application for

rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana
Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4. 9. In the event relator elects
to file a new application with this court, the application must be
filed on or before January 30, 2026.
filing on this Any future

issue should include proof that a timely extension to the return
date was obtained, the entire contents of this application, the

missing items noted above, and a copy of this ruling.

PMC
HG
TPS

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

k

Y- CEERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT