State Of Louisiana v. Rudolph Lurding

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2025 KW 0965

VERSUS

RUDOLPH LURDING NOVEMBER 3, 2025

In Re: Rudolph Lurding, applying for supervisory writs, 21st
Judicial District Court, Parish of Tangipahoa, No. CR-
1802624.

BEFORE : LANIER, WOLFE, AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator failed to include
the district court’s ruling on the motion to correct an illegal
sentence, the minutes and/or transcript of his sentencing hearing,
and a copy of the motion to correct an illegal sentence hearing
transcript. See City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So.2d 710 (La.),
cert. denied, 464 U.S. 896, 104 S.Ct. 246, 78 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983).
Accordingly, this court cannot adequately review the trial court’s
ruling at issue. Supplementation of this writ application and/or
an application for rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform
Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9. In the
event relator elects to file a new application with this court, he
may do so on or before February 19, 2026. Any future filing on
this issue should include the entire contents of this application,
the missing items noted above, and a copy of this ruling.

wi
EW
CHE

OURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

\
LAI LWO 4 SOY (WO
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
} FOR THE COURT