State Of Louisiana v. Kari Hugh
State Of Louisiana v. Kari Hugh, No. 2025 KW 1017 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Jan. 9, 2026).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Cole v. ST. FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INS. CO. 433 So. 2d 710
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISTANA NO. 2025 Kw 1017
VERSUS
KARI HUGH JANUARY 9, 2026
In Re: Kari Hugh, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial
District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 635837.
BEFORE: MILLER, EDWARDS, AND FIELDS, JJ.
WRIT NOT CONSIDERED. Relator failed to comply with Uniform ©
Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 4-5 (A) and (C) (10), by
failing to include an affidavit verifying allegations of petition
ana service, and ail pertinent court minutes. Furthermore, we
note that relator failed to provide a complete copy of the trial
transcripts and any exhibits introduced at the trial, which would
be necessary to review her claims. See City of Baton Rouge v.
Plain, 433 So.2d 710 (La.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 896, 104 S.Ct.
246, 78 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983). Supplementation of this writ
application and/or an application for rehearing will not be
considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules
2-18.7 & 4-9. Inthe event relator elects to file a new application
with this court, the application shall be filed on or before March
10, 2026. Any future filing on this issue should include the
entire contents of this application, the missing items noted above,
and a copy of this ruling.
SMM
BDE
WEF