State Of Louisiana v. James Hudson Dudley
State Of Louisiana v. James Hudson Dudley, No. 2025 KW 1207 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Mar. 24, 2026).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- 376 So. 3d 918 not in our corpus
- 383 So. 3d 603 not in our corpus
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2025 KW 1207
VERSUS
JAMES H. DUDLEY MARCH 24, 2026
In Re: State of Louisiana, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd
Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No.
2940- F- 2021.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, C. J., GREENE AND STROMBERG, JJ.
WRIT GRANTED. The district court abused its discretion in
ruling the " hookup text" is admissible at trial for purposes of
cross- examining the victim. The right of a defendant to present a
defense is balanced against the victim' s interests under the rape
shield statute, which is meant to protect the victim of rape from
having her sexual history made public. See La. Code Evid. art.
412( A) & ( F); State v. Curtin, 2022- 1110 ( La. App. lst Cir.
10/ 5/ 23), 376 So. 3d 918, writ denied, 2023- 01464 ( La. 4/ 23/ 24),
383 So. 3d 603. The right to present a defense does not mandate
that the trial court permit the introduction of irrelevant evidence
or evidence that has so little probative value so that it is
substantially outweighed by other legitimate considerations in the
administration of justice. State v. Dillon, 2018- 0027 ( La. App.
1st Cir. 9/ 21/ 18), 2018 WL 4520463, * 8( unpublished).
HG
TPS
McClendon, C. J., concurs. The State is conceding the
admissibility of the 2: 16 a. m. text; therefore, defendant is not
barred from arguing or eliciting testimony that A. B. had sex with
defendant believing him to be CTD.
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT
FOR THE COURT