In Re: Jonas Mark Robinson
In Re: Jonas Mark Robinson, No. 2025-B-00175 (La. May 29, 2025).
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
May 29, 2025
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
IN RE: JONAS MARK ROBINSON
No. 2025-B-00175
_ _ _ _
_ _
IN
RE: Jonas Mark Robinson - Applicant Other; Office of Disciplinary Counsel -
Applicant Other; Joint Petition for Consent Discipline;
_ _ _ _ _ _
May 29, 2025
Joint petition for consent discipline accepted. See per curiam.
Hughes, J., dissents and would reject the proposed discipline as too harsh.
Griffin, J., dissents and would reject the proposed discipline as too harsh.
Guidry, J., dissents and would reject the proposed discipline as too harsh.
JLW
WJC
JBM
CRC
05/29/2025 "See News Release 025 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
NO. 2025-B-0175
IN RE: JONAS MARK ROBINSON
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
PER CURIAM
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) commence d an investigation
into allegations that respondent mishandled his client trust account and practiced law
while ineligible to do so . Prior to the filing of formal charges, respondent and the
ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that
Jonas Mark Robinson , Louisiana Bar Roll number 21058 , be suspended from the
practice of law for a period of one year and one day . All but thirty days of this
suspension shall be deferred, followed by a two-year period of probation governed
by the conditions set forth in the petition for consent discipline. The probationary
period shall commence from the date respondent and the ODC execute a formal
probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of
probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for
making the deferred portion of the suspension executory, or imposing additional
discipline, as appropriate.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are
assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1,
with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court’s
judgment until paid.