2025-KH-00489 Precedential Writ application denied. Processed

State Of Louisiana v. Malcolm Jamal Naverro

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed August 22, 2025

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

Supreme Court of Louisiana
August 22, 2025
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
MALCOLM JAMAL NAVERRO
No. 2025-KH-00489
_ _
_ _ _ _
IN
RE: Malcolm Jamal Naverro - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory
Writ, Parish of St. Mary, 16th Judicial District Court Number(s) 06- 170099, Court
of Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2024 KW 1307;
_ _ _ _ _ _
August 22, 2025
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
PDG
JLW
WJC
JBM
JMG
CRC
08/22/2025 "See News Release 036 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 25-KH-0489
STATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
MALCOLM JAMAL NAVERRO
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE SIXTEENTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. MARY
PER CURIAM :
Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and
applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art.
930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State , 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post -conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post -
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.