State Of Louisiana v. Jason David Landry
State Of Louisiana v. Jason David Landry, No. 2025-KH-00736 (La. Nov. 12, 2025).
Opinion text
Supreme Court of Louisiana
November 12, 2025
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA
VS.
JASON DAVID LANDRY
No. 2025-KH-00736
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Jason David Landry - Applicant Defendant; Applying For Supervisory Writ,
Parish of St. Tammany, 22nd Judicial District Court Number(s) 603835, Court of
Appeal, First Circuit, Number(s) 2025 KW 0239;
_ _ _ _ _ _
November 12, 2025
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
WJC
JLW
JDH
JBM
PDG
JMG
CRC
11/12/2025 "See News Release 050 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."
SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 25-KH-0736
STATE OF LOUISIANA
v.
JASON DAVID LANDRY
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-SECOND
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY
PER CURIAM:
Denied. Applicant fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance
of counsel during plea negotiations under the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984).
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post -conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. ' 2244, Louisiana
post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive
application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4
and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the
legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars
against successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully
litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter,
unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a
successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral
review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this
per curiam.