2025-KH-00946 Precedential Writ application denied. Processed

Clarence O. Gibson v. 24th Judicial District Criminal Court Of Jefferson Parish

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed December 16, 2025

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

Supreme Court of Louisiana
December 16, 2025
Chief Deputy Clerk of Court
For the Court
The Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana
CLARENCE O. GIBSON
VS.
24TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CRIMINAL COURT OF JEFFERSON
PARISH
No. 2025-KH-00946
_ _
_ _ _ _
I
N RE: Clarence Gibson - Applicant Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory Writ,
Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Number(s) 07- 6779, Court of
Appeal, Fifth Circuit, Number(s) 25-KH-283;
_ _ _ _ _ _
December 16, 2025
Writ application denied. See per curiam.
JMG
JLW
JDH
WJC
JBM
PDG
CRC
12/16/2025 "See News Release 055 for any Concurrences and/or Dissents."

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
No. 25-KH-0946
CLARENCE O. GIBSON
v.
24TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF JEFFERSON PARISH
ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE TWENTY-FOURTH
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF JEFFERSON
PER CURIAM:
Denied. The application was not timely filed in the district court, and
applicant fails to carry his burden to show that an exception applies. La.C.Cr.P. art.
930.8; State ex rel. Glover v. State, 93-2330 (La. 9/5/95), 660 So.2d 1189.
Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post -conviction relief in
state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post -
conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application
only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within
the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in
2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against
successive filings mandatory. Applicant’s claims have now been fully litigated in
accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can
show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive
application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The
district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.