2026 CA 0260 Nonprecedential Affirmed as amended Processed

Connie St. Pierre v. Mossy Motors, L.L.C.

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed September 18, 2026

Opinion text

STATE OF LOUISIANA

0

FIRST CIRCUIT

2026 CA 0260

CONNIE ST. PIERRE

VERSUS

MOSSY MOTORS, L.L.C., ET AL.

Judgment Rendered: SEP 1 8 2026

On Appeal from the
22nd Judicial District Court
In and for the Parish of St. Tammany
State of Louisiana
Case No. 2024- 14964

Honorable Tara F. Zeller, Judge Presiding

Douglas McGinity Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellant
Covington, Louisiana Connie St. Pierre

Robert E. Kerrigan, Jr. Counsel for Defendants/ Appellees
K. Chance Carter Mossy of Mississippi, L.L.C., Roger
New Orleans, Louisiana Bacon, Jr., and Beth Brockert Bacon

BEFORE: PENZATO, LANIER, AND FIELDS, JJ.

LANIER, J.

In this case, plaintiff, Connie St. Pierre, filed suit against defendants, Mossy

Motors, L.L.C.; 1 Mossy of Mississippi, L.L.C. (" Mossy Mississippi"), as a wholly

owned subsidiary of Mossy Motors, L.L.C.; and Roger Bacon, Jr. and Beth Brockert

Bacon, both named as managers of Mossy Mississippi, seeking damages related to

her vehicle that was stolen from Mossy Mississippi and subsequently destroyed. In

response to Ms. St. Pierre' s petition, Mossy Mississippi filed declinatory exceptions

jurisdiction, improper venue, and
raising the objections of lack of personal

insufficiency of service of process. Following a hearing, the trial court sustained the

declinatory exceptions filed by Mossy Mississippi and dismissed, with prejudice,

Ms. St. Pierre's claims against Mossy Mississippi.' Ms. St. Pierre appealed,

challenging the effect of the judgment as to Mossy Mississippi alone. The sole issue

for our review is whether the trial court erred in dismissing Ms. St. Pierre' s claims

against Mossy Mississippi with prejudice.

The function of a declinatory exception is to decline the jurisdiction of the

court, but it does not tend to defeat the action. La. Code Civ. P. art. 923; Dupre v.

Floyd, 2002- 0153 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 12/ 20/ 02), 845 So. 2d 370, 371. Thus, a dismissal

with prejudice based on a declinatory exception is generally contrary to the

underlying rationale of a declinatory exception. See Robbins v. Delta Wire Rope,

Inc., 2015- 1757 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 6/ 3/ 16), 196 So. 3d 700, 706. The trial court had

no authority to issue a judgment that bars Ms. St. Pierre from bringing her cause of

action against Mossy Mississippi as a separate claim in a proper forum. See

1 Pursuant to a motion filed by Ms. St. Pierre, the trial court dismissed, with prejudice, all rights,
claims, and causes of action asserted against Mossy Motors, L.L.C. by Ms. St. Pierre in their
entirety.

2 The Bacons filed a peremptory exception raising the objection of no cause of action. The trial
court sustained the objection and dismissed, with prejudice, Ms. St. Pierre' s claims against the
Bacons. This portion of the trial court's judgment is final.

2

NorthShore Regional Medical Center, L.L.C. v. Dill, 2011- 2271 ( La. App. I Cir.

6/ 8/ 12), 94 So. 3d 155, 165, writ denied, 2012- 1494 ( La. 10/ 8/ 12), 98 So. 3d 862.

Accordingly, we amend the trial court's judgment to reflect that Connie St. Pierre's

claims against Mossy of Mississippi, L.L.C. are dismissed " without prejudice" and

affirm as amended.

We issue this summary opinion in accordance with Uniform Rules—Courts of

Appeal, Rule 2- 16. 2A(2) and ( 4) and assess all costs associated with this appeal

equally between the parties..

AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.

3