Connie St. Pierre v. Mossy Motors, L.L.C.
Connie St. Pierre v. Mossy Motors, L.L.C., No. 2026 CA 0260 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. Sept. 18, 2026).
Opinion text
STATE OF LOUISIANA
0
FIRST CIRCUIT
2026 CA 0260
CONNIE ST. PIERRE
VERSUS
MOSSY MOTORS, L.L.C., ET AL.
Judgment Rendered: SEP 1 8 2026
On Appeal from the
22nd Judicial District Court
In and for the Parish of St. Tammany
State of Louisiana
Case No. 2024- 14964
Honorable Tara F. Zeller, Judge Presiding
Douglas McGinity Counsel for Plaintiff/Appellant
Covington, Louisiana Connie St. Pierre
Robert E. Kerrigan, Jr. Counsel for Defendants/ Appellees
K. Chance Carter Mossy of Mississippi, L.L.C., Roger
New Orleans, Louisiana Bacon, Jr., and Beth Brockert Bacon
BEFORE: PENZATO, LANIER, AND FIELDS, JJ.
LANIER, J.
In this case, plaintiff, Connie St. Pierre, filed suit against defendants, Mossy
Motors, L.L.C.; 1 Mossy of Mississippi, L.L.C. (" Mossy Mississippi"), as a wholly
owned subsidiary of Mossy Motors, L.L.C.; and Roger Bacon, Jr. and Beth Brockert
Bacon, both named as managers of Mossy Mississippi, seeking damages related to
her vehicle that was stolen from Mossy Mississippi and subsequently destroyed. In
response to Ms. St. Pierre' s petition, Mossy Mississippi filed declinatory exceptions
jurisdiction, improper venue, and
raising the objections of lack of personal
insufficiency of service of process. Following a hearing, the trial court sustained the
declinatory exceptions filed by Mossy Mississippi and dismissed, with prejudice,
Ms. St. Pierre's claims against Mossy Mississippi.' Ms. St. Pierre appealed,
challenging the effect of the judgment as to Mossy Mississippi alone. The sole issue
for our review is whether the trial court erred in dismissing Ms. St. Pierre' s claims
against Mossy Mississippi with prejudice.
The function of a declinatory exception is to decline the jurisdiction of the
court, but it does not tend to defeat the action. La. Code Civ. P. art. 923; Dupre v.
Floyd, 2002- 0153 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 12/ 20/ 02), 845 So. 2d 370, 371. Thus, a dismissal
with prejudice based on a declinatory exception is generally contrary to the
underlying rationale of a declinatory exception. See Robbins v. Delta Wire Rope,
Inc., 2015- 1757 ( La. App. 1 Cir. 6/ 3/ 16), 196 So. 3d 700, 706. The trial court had
no authority to issue a judgment that bars Ms. St. Pierre from bringing her cause of
action against Mossy Mississippi as a separate claim in a proper forum. See
1 Pursuant to a motion filed by Ms. St. Pierre, the trial court dismissed, with prejudice, all rights,
claims, and causes of action asserted against Mossy Motors, L.L.C. by Ms. St. Pierre in their
entirety.
2 The Bacons filed a peremptory exception raising the objection of no cause of action. The trial
court sustained the objection and dismissed, with prejudice, Ms. St. Pierre' s claims against the
Bacons. This portion of the trial court's judgment is final.
2
NorthShore Regional Medical Center, L.L.C. v. Dill, 2011- 2271 ( La. App. I Cir.
6/ 8/ 12), 94 So. 3d 155, 165, writ denied, 2012- 1494 ( La. 10/ 8/ 12), 98 So. 3d 862.
Accordingly, we amend the trial court's judgment to reflect that Connie St. Pierre's
claims against Mossy of Mississippi, L.L.C. are dismissed " without prejudice" and
affirm as amended.
We issue this summary opinion in accordance with Uniform Rules—Courts of
Appeal, Rule 2- 16. 2A(2) and ( 4) and assess all costs associated with this appeal
equally between the parties..
AFFIRMED AS AMENDED.
3