2026 CW 0500 Nonprecedential Writ granted Processed

Elizabeth Strealy and Todd Strealy v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and A&M College

Louisiana Court of Appeal, First Circuit · Filed July 20, 2026

Opinion text

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

ELIZABETH STREALY AND TODD NO. 2026 CW 0500
OTREALY

VERSUS

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY
AND A&M COLLEGE JULY 20, 2026

In Re: Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University and
A&M College ("LSU"), applying for supervisory writs,
19th Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton
Rouge, No. 715604.

BEFORE : THERIOT, PENZATO, AND BALFOUR, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. The trial court’s March 31, 2026 judgment
denying the motion for summary judgment of the Board of Supervisors
of Louisiana State University and A&M College (“LSU”) is reversed.
The deviation of which plaintiff complains is well within the 1 to
1.5 inches that Louisiana courts have found do not present an
unreasonable risk of harm. Chambers v. Vill. of Moreauville, 2011-
898 (La. 1/24/12), 85 So.3d 593, 598; Boyle v. Board of
Supervisors, Louisiana State University, 96-1158 (La. 1/14/97),
685 So.2d 1080, 1082-84; Williams v. Leonard Chabert Med. Ctr.,
98-1029 (La. App. ist Cir. 9/26/99), 744 So.2d 206, 210, writ
denied, 2000-0011 (La. 2/18/00), 754 So.2d 974. The deviation,
located near the Barnes & Noble bookstore on LSU’s campus is a
heavily trafficked area with no history of similar trip-and-fall
accidents, which suggest that the likelihood and magnitude of
potential harm were low. See Jefferson v. Nichols State Univ.,
2019-1137 (La. App. Ist Cir. 5/11/20), 311 So.3d 1083, 1087, writ
denied, 2020-00779 (La. 11/4/20), 303 So.3d 623. Plaintiffs,
Elizabeth and Todd Strealy, have not met their burden of proof on
summary judgment to demonstrate that the alleged defect was
unreasonably dangerous or that LSU had actual or constructive
notice of the defect. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment
filed by defendant, LSU, is granted, and plaintiffs’ claims against
LSU are dismissed with prejudice.

MRT
AHP
KEB

EF COURT
FOR THE COURT