State Of Louisiana v. Carleen Causey

STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2026 KW 0865
VERSUS

CARLEEN CAUSEY JULY 13, 2026
In Re: Carleen Causey, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, Nos.
2749-F-2025 / 2750-M-2025 ; 1585-F-2024 / 1587-M-2024.

BEFORE : PENZATO, GREENE, AND FIELDS, JJ.

WRIT DENTED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator does not clearly
state what relief she seeks. If relator intends to seek review of
the district court’s ruling on the motion to suppress, she should
specifically request that relief and identify how she believes the
district court erred. Additionally, relator failed to include a
copy of the suppression hearing transcript, the State’s
opposition, if any, and the bill of information. Therefore, this
court cannot adequately review the district court’s ruling herein.
See City of Baton Rouge v. Plain, 433 So.2d 710 (ha.), cert.
denied, 464 U.S. 896, 104 S. Ct. 246, 78 L.Ed.2d 235 (1983).
Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application for
rehearing will not be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana
Courts of Appeal, Rules 2-18.7 & 4-9. Any future filing on this
issue should include the entire contents of this application, the
missing items noted above, and a copy of this ruling.

AHP
HG
WEF

COWRT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Dy SOV
am \ i} .
a ane” La XO

DEPUTY CLERR™OF COURT
(\ FOR THE COURT