Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baudin v. Traders & General Insurance Company, 201 So. 2d 379.

19 citing documents.

Baker v. Hurst 50 So. 3d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
Ursin v. Webb 945 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
Terminix Services v. State Farm Mut. Auto 803 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Cantrelle v. State Farm General Insurance Co. 618 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Baudin v. Traders & General Insurance Company, (La.App.
Criticized Blue v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 493 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Green v. DeFelice 466 So. 2d 1373 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Tolleson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. 449 So. 2d 105 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Carter v. CITY PARISH GOVERNMENT, ETC. 423 So. 2d 1080 La. 1982
Carter v. City Parish Government of East Baton Rouge 409 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Co., (1967), writ refused, 251 La.
Mangum v. Weigel 393 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
In Baudin v. Traders & General Insurance Company, La.App., , at pages 384 and 385, the court listed these six tests which have been used to determine whether or not an injury arose out of the "use" of an automobile: "It is not our purpose here to establish a required list of tests of causation for holding that the accident is one `arising out of' the use of the automobile.
Willie v. Kimball 388 So. 2d 112 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Baudin v. Traders & General Insurance Company, (La.App.
Sherville v. NATIONAL U. FIRE INS. CO., ETC. 387 So. 2d 1181 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Duvigneaud v. Government Emp. Ins. Co. 363 So. 2d 1292 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
In Baudin v. Traders & General Insurance Company, (La.App.
Howard v. Ponthieux 326 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
See Baudin v. Traders & General Insurance Company, (La.App.
Tillman v. Canal Insurance Co. 305 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Defendant cites the case of Cagle v. Playland Amusement Park, La.App., (1967), and Baudin v. Traders & General Insurance Co., La.App., (1967) to buttress its argument that the courts have been very liberal in interpreting the "use" clause of automobile policies to find accidents arising out of the ownership, operation, maintenance or use of motor vehicles.
Ramsey v. Continental Insurance Company 286 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
4 Cir. 1967); Baudin v. Traders & General Insurance Co., United States Fidelity &amp
Baudin v. Traders & General Insurance Co. 252 So. 2d 133 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. Burris 240 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
Baudin v. Traders & General Insurance Company, (La.App.
Baudin v. Traders & General Insurance 203 So. 2d 557 La. 1967