Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Higginbotham, 541 So. 2d 348.

13 citing documents.

State v. Jackson 714 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
State v. Anderson 702 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Kendrick 699 So. 2d 424 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
State v. Small 693 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
State v. Clayborn 666 So. 2d 1258 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
State v. McNair 597 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
(La.App.2d Cir.1989), amended and affirmed on other grounds
State v. Cook 598 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
State v. Driggers 582 So. 2d 369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
State v. Coleman 574 So. 2d 477 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
46 , 62 L.Ed.2d 31 (1979); (La.
State v. Bishop 571 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
State v. Higginbotham 556 So. 2d 28 La. 1990
Prior report: La.App., .
State v. Battle 552 So. 2d 503 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
State v. Hill 552 So. 2d 556 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
: “The test imposed by the reviewing court in determining the excessiveness of a sentence is two-pronged.