Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Serres, 66 So. 342.
- Succession of Falgout 279 So. 2d 679 La. 1973
-
Estate of Rice v. Deville
240 So. 2d 379
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
643 (1850), and *383 , 66 So.
-
Succession of Simms
195 So. 2d 114
La. 1966
The suggested interpretation was given such codal articles in , 66 So.
-
Fortson v. Lake, Inc.
176 So. 2d 703
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
Art. 3211, which provides that the succession representative shall be deemed to have possession of all succession property, and to various cases, such as , 66 So.
-
Simpson v. Colvin
138 So. 2d 438
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
The above quoted language from Bird v. Jones, supra, was quoted with approval by the Supreme Court in , 66 So.
- Succession of Hemenway 83 So. 2d 377 La. 1955
-
Succession of Rembert
7 So. 2d 40
La. 1942
The testator, in order that the provisions of his will may be carried out in accordance with his wishes, has not only the unlimited power to appoint the executor thereof ( , 66 So.
- Rivet v. Battistella 120 So. 289 La. 1929
-
Succession of Dyer
99 So. 214
La. 1924
Ann. 437 ; and , 66 South.