Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Covey v. Marquette Casualty Company, 84 So. 2d 217.

17 citing documents.

Blackwell v. Oser 436 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
Brauninger v. Ducote 381 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
Parker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 335 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
4th Cir. 1962) cert, denied; (La.App.
McKey v. Dow Chemical Co., Inc. 295 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
323 ; Edwards v. Miranne, La.App., ; Covey v. Marquette Casualty Co., La.App., ; Holland v. St.
Wilton Jones Company v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 248 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Covey v. Marquette Casualty Company, La.App., (1955); Maher v. Schlosser, La.App., (1962).
Buckelew v. Plunkett 242 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
In Covey v. Marquette Casualty Company, La.App., (Orl.1955) the court stated: "* * * Of course there should be no recovery for this item as it seems to us that Covey should have made other arrangements to have his wife's welfare looked after."
Brumfield v. Fisher 235 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Berry v. Gulf Coast Construction Co. 229 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Voelker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 190 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
33 ; Johnston v. Fidelity National Bank of Baton Rouge, La.App., ; Vinet v. Checker Cab Company, La.App., ; Honeycutt v. American General Insurance Company, La.App., ; Covey v. Marquette Casualty Company, La.App., ; Hughes v. Gill, La.App., ; Davies v. Consolidated Underwriters, La.App., ; Edwards v. Miranne, La.App., ; Seligman v. Holladay, La.App., 154 So.
Jaeger v. Herald 186 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Duet v. Cheramie 176 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
481 ; Davies v. Consolidated Underwriters, La.App., ; Hughes v. Gill, La.App., ; Covey v. Marquette Casualty Co., La.App., ; Honeycutt v. American General Insurance Co., La.App., ; Vinet v. Checker Cab Company, La.App., ; Johnston v. Fidelity National Bank of Baton Rouge, La.App., ; Mahaffey v. Official Detective Stories, Inc., 210 F.Supp.
Williams v. Brown 142 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
73 ; Covey v. Marquette Casualty Company (Ct.App., Orl., 1955), .
Blanke v. Chisesi 142 So. 2d 45 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
740 answers the question in the negative : “ * * * the right of action is not transmissible from one survivor to another survivor of the injured person, either by the general law of inheritance, or by virtue of the statute on the subj ect.” Appellants cite the following cases as sustaining their contentions: Covey v. Marquette Casualty Company, La.App., ; Ramsey v. McDaniel, La.App., ; Mahfouz v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters, etc., La.App., ; Dumas v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Comp
Maher v. Schlosser 144 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Holland v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. 135 So. 2d 145 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Next in this same line of jurisprudence, counsel cites Covey v. Marquette Casualty Co. (1956) La.App., , holding that a husband may not recover for mental suffering arising from injury to his wife.
Dumas v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co. 125 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
This precise question has been answered in the case of Covey v. Marquette Casualty Company, 1956, , in which the Orleans Court of Appeal held as follows in an opinion written by Judge Janvier: "Though various judicial decisions have evidenced disagreements or misunderstandings as to the effect of the survival provisions, which, as a result of amendments, now appear in Article 2315 of our LSA-Civil Code, it se
Lally v. Taylor 117 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1960
We ourselves in Covey v. Marquette Casualty Co., La.App., , referring to Article 2315, said: “However, the article, as now amended, creates a new right in the various survivors who are designated and under that right they, as survivors though not as heirs, may, by substituting themselves, continue with the suit which was commenced by the original plaintiff, provided the