Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Alexander v. Standard Oil Co., 72 So. 806.
- Byrd v. Bossier Parish School Bd. 543 So. 2d 35 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
- Romano v. Lomasney 423 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Boyer v. Johnson
360 So. 2d 1164
La. 1978
Justice Provosty, , 72 So.
- Jones v. Insurance Company of North America 303 So. 2d 902 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
- Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. 137 So. 2d 298 La. 1962
- Cropper v. Mills 27 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
-
Picou v. J. B. Luke's Sons
16 So. 2d 466
La. 1943
It was held by this court in the case off Alexander v. Standard Oil Co. (on rehearing), , 72 So.
-
Bagesse v. Thistlewaite Lumber Co.
125 So. 322
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
In the case of Alexander vs. Standard Oil Company of Louisiana, , 72 So.
-
Lipscomb v. Standard Highway Co.
124 So. 156
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1929
es are sustained by the servants in consequence thereof, such provisions are not to be so construed as to abrogate the ordinary rules relating to contributory negligence, which is available as a defense, notwithstanding the statute, unless the latter is so worded as to leave no doubt that such defense is to be excluded.” The question was re-examined in Alexander vs. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, , 72 So.
- Majors v. Allen Mfg. Co. 80 So. 549 La. 1919
- Flores v. Steeg Printing & Publishing Co. 78 So. 119 La. 1918