Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bielkiewicz v. Insurance Company of North America, 201 So. 2d 130.

33 citing documents.

William Alan Pesnell And La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
Succession of Clinton Cameron Schreiber La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
Co. of North America, (La.
Robert Schiff v. Lawrence G. Pugh, III, Frederick T. Haas, III, Alexander L. Burns, and Pugh, Accardo, Haas, … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2021
“The evident purpose of [the certificate requirement] is to avoid uncertainty as to the extinction of favored rights of appeal and to prevent disputes such as the present.” Id ( (La.
Perniciaro v. McInnis 255 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Co. of North America , (La.
State in the Interest of S.A. & P. C.-A. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
4 Cir. 3/13/08), (La.App.
In Re: Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living Trust and Eleanor Pierce Stevens Revocable Gift Trust La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
However, “[w]hen an appeal is taken from a final judgment, the appellant is entitled to a review of all adverse interlocutory rulings in addition to review of the final judgment.” (1993) ( (La.App.
In re Eleanor Pierce (Marshall) Stevens Living Trust 159 So. 3d 1101 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
However, “[w]hen an appeal is taken from a final judgment, the appellant is entitled to a review of all adverse interlocutory rulings in addition to review of the final judgment.” (1993) ( (La.App.
Benton Specialties, Inc.,et Al. v. Cajun Well Service, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
3 Cir.), writ not considered, (citations omitted), Cajun asserts that “[w]hen a judgment is rendered on the merits of the case, any interlocutory judgment becomes part of the final decree and is subject to review on appeal.” (La.App.
Benton Specialties, Inc. v. Cajun Well Service, Inc. 13 So. 3d 257 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
878 , (1971) (citations omitted), Cajun asserts that “[wjhen a judgment is rendered on the merits of the case, any interlocutory judgment becomes part of the final decree and is subject to review on appeal.” (La.App.
ARGENCE LLC v. Box Opportunities, Inc. 980 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
Sporl v. Sporl 788 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Co. of North America, (La.App.
White v. White 747 So. 2d 176 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Watson v. Nelson 702 So. 2d 1002 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Housing Authority for Ferriday v. Parker 629 So. 2d 475 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Andras v. Maintenance Coastal Sales & Service Co. 572 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Core v. Winn-Dixie of Louisiana, Inc. 471 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
4th Cir. 1970); (La.App.
Roy Fink, Inc. v. STATE, DOTD 464 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Co. of North America, (La.App.
Louisiana Offset Printers, Inc. v. White 407 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
3rd Cir. 1976); (La.App.
Smedes-Jardine & Co. v. Romero 376 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Trailwood Forest-Calcasieu, Ltd. v. Coursey 372 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Boswell v. Jeff Cantrell Homes, Inc. 333 So. 2d 374 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
McQuillin v. Ezernack 331 So. 2d 125 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Carville v. City of Plaquemine 303 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Bielkiewicz v. Insurance Company of North America, La.App., ; Texas Gas Transmission Corporation v. Soileau, La.App., .
Succession of Sharp 271 So. 2d 917 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Broussard v. Annaloro 265 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
Great American Insurance Companies v. East 264 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Moon v. Moon 244 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Hepler v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 239 So. 2d 669 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
In Bielkiewicz v. Insurance Company of North America, La.App., , where there was no clerk's certificate of the date of mailing of notice of judgment, the Court refused to dismiss an appeal, stating: "By LSA-CCP Art. 1913, as amended in 1961 * * * the district clerk is under a mandatory duty to file a certificate showing the date of mailing of the judgment *671 and to whom.
Uhlhorn v. Caire 239 So. 2d 713 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Malone v. Fowler 228 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Brasseaux v. Girouard 214 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Overruled Dupuis v. Broadhurst 213 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
In the case of Bielkiewicz v. Insurance Company of North America (La.App., 3 Cir., 1967), , this Court held: "When an unrestricted appeal is taken from a final judgment, the appellant is entitled to a review of all adverse interlocutory rulings prejudicial to him, in addition to the review of the correctness of the final judgment appealed from.
Bielkiewicz v. Rudisill 201 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967