DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ehtor v. Parish, 86 So. 2d 543.

26 citing documents.

  • Nolan v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 201 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1967
    Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., .” The only conclusion we can reach is that the combined and concurrent negligence of both drivers was the proximate cause of the accident.
  • Sturcken v. Smith 192 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., .
  • Gauthreaux v. Hogan 185 So. 2d 44 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    Noonan v. London Guarantee & Accident Company, La.App., ; Janice v. Whitley, La.App., ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., .
  • Granata v. Simpson 181 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Orleans, ), we have pointed out that the driver on the favored street is ordinarily not contributorily negligent in proceeding past a blind corner into an intersection at a reasonable speed, nor for failing to observe the approach of vehicles on less favored intersecting streets when the view is blocked.
  • Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. Dardar 158 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    Noonan v. London Guarantee & Accident Company, La.App., ; Janice v. Whitley, La.App., ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., .
  • Biggs v. Verbois 151 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Co., La.App.1946, ; Hooper v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Co., La.App.1951, ; Volz v. Fertel, La.App.1957, ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App.1956, ; Brown v. Checker Cab Co., supra; Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Ins.
  • Jenkins v. Brignac 146 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    2d 512 ; Marler v. State, La.App., ; Gautreaux v. Southern Farm Bureau Gas Co., La.App., ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., .
  • Joseph v. Fulco 145 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • West v. TL James & Company 142 So. 2d 853 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    App., ; Alvares v. Rush, La.App., ."
  • Central National Insurance v. Zorratti 141 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    To stop and *466 then proceed forward without ascertaining if it is safe to do so is negligence of a gross character and renders the person guilty of such imprudence responsible in damages resulting therefrom.” Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., .
  • Emmco Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 138 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Simth v. Hoye, supra [La.App., ]; Stevens v. Delanoix, La.App., ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., ; Brashears v. Tyson, La.App., ; Sampey v. Martin, La.App., ; Thibodaux v. Willet, La.App., ; Hochenedel v. Heard, La.App., 188 So.
  • Washington Fire & Marine Insurance v. Bacon 138 So. 2d 667 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Hardy v. M. W. Salomon & Son, Inc., La.App., ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., ; Trippi v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co., La.App., .
  • Hilton v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance Company 134 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    While the driver on the less favored street may be held negligent for entering when his view of traffic approaching the intersection is obstructed by a blind corner (Ehtor v. Parish, *87 La.App.Orleans, ), we have pointed out that the driver on the favored street is ordinarily not contributorily negligent in proceeding past a blind corner into an intersection at a reasonable speed, nor for failing to observe the approach of vehicles on less favored intersecting streets when the view is blocked.
  • Guarisco v. Swindle 132 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., ; Gautreaux v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co., supra; Marler v. State, La.
  • Livaccari v. United Jewish Appeal, Inc. 126 So. 2d 67 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., ; Gautreaux v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Co., supra; Marler v. State, La.App., ; New Hampshire Fire Ins.
  • Lavigne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 125 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    App.1956, ; Brown v. Checker Cab Co., supra; Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Ins.
  • Sharp v. Travelers Indemnity Co. 122 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Co., La.App., ; Entor v. Parish, La.App., ; Alvares v. Rush, La.App., .
  • Allen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 120 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    2d 844 ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., ; Brashears v. Tyson, La.App., ; Sampey v. Martin, La.App., ; Thibodaux v. Willet, La.App., ; Hochenedel v. Heard, La.
  • McCandless v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 120 So. 2d 501 La. 1960
    585 , ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., ; LeBlanc v. Jones, La.App., ; Howard v. Great American Indemnity Company, La.App., ; Geoghegan v. Greyhound Corporation, 226 La.
  • Fourcade v. Ryan Stevedoring Co. 117 So. 2d 587 La. 1960
    105 , ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., ; Marks v. New Orleans Cold Storage Co., 107 La.
  • Janice v. Whitley 111 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    While the driver on the less favored street may be held negligent for entering when his view of traffic approaching the intersection is obstructed by a blind corner (Ehtor v. Parish, La.App.Orleans, ), we have pointed out that the driver on the favored street is ordinarily not contributorily negligent in proceeding past a blind corner into an intersection at a reasonable speed, nor for failing to observe the approach of vehicles on less favored intersecting streets when the view is blocked.
  • Russell v. Bourgeois 102 So. 2d 92 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., ; Toups v. Trent, La.App., ; Boudreaux v. Moreau, La.App., ; Vernaci v. Columbia Gas Co., La.App., ; Lafont v. Nola Cabs, Inc., La.App., .
  • Weidner v. Globe Indemnity Co. 98 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Connecticut, La.App.1954, ; Broughton v. Touchstone, La.App.1954, ; Ehtor v. Parish, La.App.1956, .
  • Stevens v. Delanoix 96 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    In Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., , a "blind corner" was the scene of an intersectional collision and therein it was stated "that a driver on a right-of-way thoroughfare has the right to entertain a belief that motroists on intersecting streets and roads will comply with the law and will not enter on the superior thoroughfare in his path, especia
  • Toups v. Trent 85 So. 2d 96 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    In discussing this same Booth case, we, in an opinion rendered this day, Ehtor v. Parish, La.App., , said: “Decisions of the Supreme Court are to be accorded only a reasonable construction, and with this in mind we feel sure that the Supreme Court never intended that its holding in Booth v. Columbia Casualty Co., supra, would be applicable in a case such as the one before us where the motorist claiming the pre-empt
  • Parish v. Ehtor 86 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    This is the second of the consolidated suits which arose out of the automobile accident discussed in an opinion and decree handed down this day by this court in Ehtor v. Parish & Great American Indemnity Co., La.App., .