DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Roux v. Attardo, 93 So. 2d 332.

15 citing documents.

  • Bertrand v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Company 160 So. 2d 19 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    App.], ; Cush v. Griffin, La.App.1957, ; Mire v. St.
  • Bourgeois v. Neeb Kearney & Co. 154 So. 2d 72 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Roux v. Attardo, La.App., ; Knighten v. American Automobile Insurance Company, La.App., .
  • Emmco Insurance v. Nola Cabs, Inc. 144 So. 2d 496 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Emmco Insurance v. Palmisano 144 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Renz v. Texas & Pacific Railway Company 138 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    See Roux v. Attardo, La.App.1957, ; Cush v. Griffin, La.App.1957, ; Mire v. St.
  • Begnaud v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company 136 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Roux v. Attardo, La.App.Orl., ; Cush v. Griffin, La.App.
  • Cage v. Standard Motor Car Co. 136 So. 2d 428 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    App., ; Roux v. Attardo, La.App., ; Jackson v. Young, La.App., .
  • Lemoine v. Goudeau 127 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Roux v. Attardo, La.App., , Jackson v. Young, La.App., .
  • Richard v. Barker 124 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Roux v. Attardo et al., La.App., ; Jackson v. Young, La.App., ; Lebo v. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company of New York, La.App., .
  • Simon v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company 124 So. 2d 646 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    See Roux v. Attardo, La.App.1957, ; Cush v. Griffin, La.App.1957, ; Mire v. St.
  • Spears v. American Fidelity & Casualty Company 123 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    In Roux v. Attardo, La.App., , this court in considering conflicting testimony adduced at a jury trial made the observation: "Great weight attaches to the findings of fact by a jury as well as by a trial judge and to their ability to judge the credibility of witnesses where there is sharp conflict in testimony, and in the absence of clear an
  • Knighten v. American Automobile Insurance Co. 121 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    1957, ; Hayes v. Illinois Central Railroad, La.App.1955, ; Futrell v. Pacific Indemnity Company, La.App.1955, .
  • Sharman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 107 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    App.1957, ; Cross v. Marquez, La.App.1957, ; Pierre v. Galloway, La.App.1957, ; Banks v. Food Town, Inc., La.App.1957, .
  • Perkins v. Wimberly 107 So. 2d 542 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    258 , ; Bethley v. Cochrane, La.App.1955, ; Fourchea v. Maloney Trucking & Storage, Inc., La.App.1956, ; Webre v. Jones, La.App.1957, ; Roux v. Attardo, La.App.1957, ; Cross v. Marquez, La.App.1957, ; Pierre v. Galloway, La.App.1957, ; Banks v. Food Town Inc., La.
  • Mire v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company 103 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    We quote from the case of Roux v. Attardo, La.App.1957, at page 335: "Great weight attaches to the findings of fact by a jury as well as by a trial judge and to their ability to judge the credibility of witnesses where there is sharp conflict in testimony, and in the absence of clear and manifest error the appellate court will not reverse the judgment on the question of de