DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Curet v. Hiern, 95 So. 2d 699.

15 citing documents.

  • Kessler v. Southmark Corp. 643 So. 2d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
  • Bunch v. Town of St. Francisville 446 So. 2d 1357 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    878 , (1965); (Orl.La.App.1957).
  • Titard v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company 282 So. 2d 474 La. 1973
  • Weiland v. King 281 So. 2d 688 La. 1973
  • Weiland v. King 262 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    679 , , 84 A.L.R.2d 1184 , .” Assuming that the light switches were on and that plaintiff did in fact find herself in total darkness on the second landing, which would be a fact finding most favorable to the plaintiff, the only conclusion that can be- reached as to the cause of the total darkness is that the bulbs in the fixtures were burned ou
  • Cooper v. Phoenix Insurance Co. 252 So. 2d 565 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    See Jumonville v. Calogne, La.App., ; Curet v. Hiern, La.App., ; Briscoe v. Bailey, La.App., .
  • Morgan v. American Indemnity Company 180 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    679 , , 84 A.L.R.2d 1184 , .
  • City of Crowley v. Prejean 173 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    128 , ; Curet v. Hiern, La.App.Orl., (building code violation).
  • Kaplyn v. Globe & Republic Insurance Co. of America 160 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    We had occasion to consider a case concerning the design of steps in New Orleans in the recent case of Curet v. Hiern, La.App., , in which we stated: “While the style and design of the stairway might not comply with present-day architectural or regulatory standards, this would not be sufficient to say that the premises were defective or that a trap existed.
  • Magoni v. Wells 154 So. 2d 524 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    Curet v. Hiern, La.App., ; Madere v. Tranchina, La.App., ; De Latour v. Roosevelt Hotel, supra.
  • Jumonville v. Calogne 141 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    And counsel contends that the present case can be distinguished from those cited by counsel for defendant, which are Gosselin v. Stilwell, La.App., ; Briscoe v. Bailey, La.App., , and Curet v. Hiern, La.App., .
  • Hays v. Wild Life and Fisheries Commission 136 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Lejeune v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNTY CO. 136 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
  • Brown & Blackwood v. Ricou-Brewster Building Co. 121 So. 2d 70 La. 1960
    See, Curet v. Hiern, La.App., ; Potter v. Soady Bldg.
  • Mahfouz v. UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS, ETC. 117 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
    App.1957, , the court stated: "After arising from bed plaintiff most probably was in a sleep-ladened condition and thoughtlessly moved about the darkened hallway.